This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 1985 Jul;38(1):91-6.

doi: 10.3758/bf03202929.

Processing of auditory information by the blind in spatial localization tasks

M C Wanet, C Veraart

PMID: 4069964
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202929

Processing of auditory information by the blind in spatial localization tasks

M C Wanet et al. Percept Psychophys. 1985 Jul.

. 1985 Jul;38(1):91-6.

doi: 10.3758/bf03202929.

Authors

M C Wanet, C Veraart

PMID: 4069964
DOI: 10.3758/bf03202929

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Evidence for enhanced discrimination of virtual auditory distance among blind listeners using level and direct-to-reverberant cues.
Kolarik AJ, Cirstea S, Pardhan S. Kolarik AJ, et al. Exp Brain Res. 2013 Feb;224(4):623-33. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3340-0. Epub 2012 Nov 22. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23178908
Locomotion of the blind controlled by natural sound cues.
Strelow ER, Brabyn JA. Strelow ER, et al. Perception. 1982;11(6):635-40. doi: 10.1068/p110635. Perception. 1982. PMID: 7186614
Location of the auditory egocentre in the blind and normally sighted.
Sukemiya H, Nakamizo S, Ono H. Sukemiya H, et al. Perception. 2008;37(10):1587-95. doi: 10.1068/p5949. Perception. 2008. PMID: 19065860 Clinical Trial.
Age-related changes in sound localisation ability.
Freigang C, Richter N, Rübsamen R, Ludwig AA. Freigang C, et al. Cell Tissue Res. 2015 Jul;361(1):371-86. doi: 10.1007/s00441-015-2230-8. Epub 2015 Jun 16. Cell Tissue Res. 2015. PMID: 26077928 Review.
Speculations on the role of frequency in sound localization.
Fuzessery ZM. Fuzessery ZM. Brain Behav Evol. 1986;28(1-3):95-108. doi: 10.1159/000118695. Brain Behav Evol. 1986. PMID: 3552112 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

From the Lab to People's Home: Lessons from Accessing Blind Participants' Interactions via Smart Glasses in Remote Studies.
Lee K, Hong J, Jarjue E, Mensah EE, Kacorri H. Lee K, et al. Web4All (2022). 2022 Apr;2022:24. doi: 10.1145/3493612.3520448. Epub 2022 Apr 27. Web4All (2022). 2022. PMID: 37942017 Free PMC article.
Effect of dual sensory loss on auditory localization: implications for intervention.
Simon HJ, Levitt H. Simon HJ, et al. Trends Amplif. 2007 Dec;11(4):259-72. doi: 10.1177/1084713807308209. Trends Amplif. 2007. PMID: 18003869 Free PMC article. Review.
Temporal cues trick the visual and auditory cortices mimicking spatial cues in blind individuals.
Gori M, Amadeo MB, Campus C. Gori M, et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Jun 1;41(8):2077-2091. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24931. Epub 2020 Feb 12. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020. PMID: 32048380 Free PMC article.
Auditory distance perception in humans: a review of cues, development, neuronal bases, and effects of sensory loss.
Kolarik AJ, Moore BC, Zahorik P, Cirstea S, Pardhan S. Kolarik AJ, et al. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Feb;78(2):373-95. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-1015-1. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016. PMID: 26590050 Free PMC article. Review.
Evidence for enhanced discrimination of virtual auditory distance among blind listeners using level and direct-to-reverberant cues.
Kolarik AJ, Cirstea S, Pardhan S. Kolarik AJ, et al. Exp Brain Res. 2013 Feb;224(4):623-33. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3340-0. Epub 2012 Nov 22. Exp Brain Res. 2013. PMID: 23178908

See all "Cited by" articles

References

1. Annu Rev Psychol. 1984;35:201-26 - PubMed
1. Perception. 1983;12(1):63-70 - PubMed
1. Annee Psychol. 1977;77(1):179-204 - PubMed
1. Am J Psychol. 1964 Mar;77:2-14 - PubMed
1. Psychol Bull. 1963 May;60:302-15 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions