Engineering a microfluidic-assisted 3D bioprinting approach for the hierarchical control deposition and compartmentalisation of graded bioinks
- PMID: 40701169
- DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/adf35b
Engineering a microfluidic-assisted 3D bioprinting approach for the hierarchical control deposition and compartmentalisation of graded bioinks
Abstract
The advent of 3D bioprinting has revolutionized tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Today, tissues of single cell type can be fabricated with extreme resolution and printing fidelity. However, the ultimate functionality of the desired tissue is limited, due to the absence of a multicellular population and diversity in micro-environment distribution. Currently, 3D bioprinting technologies are facing challenges in delivering multiple cells and biomaterials in a controlled fashion. The use of interchangeable syringe-based systems has often favoured the delamination between interfaces, greatly limiting the fabrication of interconnected tissue constructs. Microfluidic-assisted 3D bioprinting platforms have been found capable of rescuing the fabrication of tissue interfaces, but often fails to guarantee printing fidelity, cell density control and compartmentalization. Herein, we present the convergence of microfluidic and 3D bioprinting platforms into a deposition system capable of harnessing a microfluidic printhead for the continuous rapid fabrication of interconnected functional tissues. The use of flow-focusing and passive mixer printhead modules allowed for the rapid and dynamic modulation of fibre diameter and material composition, respectively. Cells were compartmentalized into discrete three-dimensional layers with defined density patterns, confirming the punctual control of the presented microfluidic platform in arranging cells and materials in 3D.In ovoandin vivostudies demonstrated the seminal functionality of 3D bioprinted constructs with patterned vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), respectively. This, in turn, facilitated the simulation of diverse cellular environments and proliferation pathways within a single construct, which is currently unachievable with conventional 3D bioprinting techniques, offering new opportunities for the fabrication of functionally graded systems and physiologically-relevant skeletal tissue substitutes.
Keywords: bioprinting; cell patterns; gradient; interface; microfluidics.
Creative Commons Attribution license.
Similar articles
-
FRESH 3D Bioprinting of Collagen Types I, II, and III.ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025 Jan 13;11(1):556-563. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01826. Epub 2024 Dec 2. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025. PMID: 39622052 Free PMC article.
-
Development and characterization of a decellularized lung ECM-based bioink for bioprinting and fabricating a lung model.Biomater Adv. 2025 Dec;177:214428. doi: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2025.214428. Epub 2025 Jul 22. Biomater Adv. 2025. PMID: 40714256
-
On-chip fabrication and in-flow 3D-printing of microgel constructs: from chip to scaffold materials in one integral process.Biofabrication. 2024 Mar 28;16(2). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ad3318. Biofabrication. 2024. PMID: 38471160
-
3D bioprinting approaches for musculoskeletal interfaces in tissue engineering.Int J Pharm. 2025 Sep 15;682:125939. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125939. Epub 2025 Jul 6. Int J Pharm. 2025. PMID: 40628344 Review.
-
3D bioprinting in tissue engineering: current state-of-the-art and challenges towards system standardization and clinical translation.Biofabrication. 2025 Aug 7;17(4). doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/ade47a. Biofabrication. 2025. PMID: 40513614 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources