Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 22;15(7):e086409.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086409.

Identifying fundamental goals of childbirth care for women with higher body weight in Swiss maternity care: an embedded mixed methods multi-stakeholder study

Affiliations

Identifying fundamental goals of childbirth care for women with higher body weight in Swiss maternity care: an embedded mixed methods multi-stakeholder study

Carmen Wyss et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The first objective of the study was to identify fundamental goals of childbirth care for women with higher body weight to inform decision-making processes by drawing on multi-stakeholder insights. The second objective included evaluating the method used to support these stakeholders in generating a more diverse set of fundamental goals.

Design: Using an embedded mixed methods design, we engaged key stakeholders in two group workshops and 11 individual interviews to identify goals considered fundamentally important for achieving the best possible childbirth care. Participants individually brainstormed childbirth care goals, selected additional goals from a pre-established masterlist and discussed them. Thereafter, participants rated the goals' perceived importance for decision-making on a Likert scale. We thematically analyzed the goals and mapped them onto a means-ends network to identify and refine a set of fundamental goals. Methodological evaluations involved descriptive statistics and non-parametric testing.

Setting: Swiss maternity care.

Participants: 21 stakeholders, including seven women with a preconceptional body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2, nine midwives, and five obstetricians experienced in maternity care for women with higher body weight.

Results: We identified eight fundamental goals of childbirth care: low maternal and neonatal complication rates, physiological childbirth processes, positive initiation of bonding and breastfeeding, positive psychosocial care experience, low physical strain for care providers, low resource use in care setting, and low direct costs of childbirth care. Individual participants generated more diverse fundamental goals on average by combining individual brainstorming with goal selection from a masterlist than by brainstorming alone. A theoretical maximum of six participants captured all eight fundamental goals.

Conclusions: The fundamental goals provide a framework for benchmarking decisions to improve childbirth care for women with higher body weight. Additionally, individual brainstorming combined with goal selection from a masterlist appears to be a useful method for generating a diverse set of fundamental goals in a healthcare context, even with relatively few participants.

Keywords: Body Mass Index; Decision Making; Methods; OBSTETRICS; Obesity; Quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Final set of fundamental goals of childbirth care for women with higher body weight.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Average perceived importance of fundamental goals for decision-making. Perceived importance for decision-making rated on an ordinal Likert scale and averaged across participants: 0=not important, 1=rather not important, 2=rather important, 3=important, 4=essential (cf. table 1, step 5). Ordinal rating data were treated as cardinal to construct importance indices for an initial exploration of potential goal prioritization among participants.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Number of participants required to capture the complete set of fundamental goals. Saturation analysis inspired by Haag et al. Minimum: Cumulative number of eight distinct fundamental goals was reached after two participants. Maximum: Cumulative number of eight distinct fundamental goals was reached after six participants. Mathematical approximation: One participant would theoretically have identified 67.3% of the eight distinct fundamental goals, two participants 89.3%, three participants 96.5%, four participants 98.9%, five participants 99.6%, and six participants 99.9% of the eight distinct fundamental goals in our study.

Similar articles

References

    1. D’Souza R, Horyn I, Pavalagantharajah S, et al. Maternal body mass index and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019;1:S2589-9333(19)30072-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marchi J, Berg M, Dencker A, et al. Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews. Obes Rev. 2015;16:621–38. doi: 10.1111/obr.12288. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vats H, Saxena R, Sachdeva MP, et al. Impact of maternal pre-pregnancy body mass index on maternal, fetal and neonatal adverse outcomes in the worldwide populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2021;15:536–45. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2021.10.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Creanga AA, Catalano PM, Bateman BT. Obesity in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:248–59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1801040. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vitner D, Harris K, Maxwell C, et al. Obesity in pregnancy: a comparison of four national guidelines. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32:2580–90. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1440546. - DOI - PubMed