Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 22:100274.
doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100274. Online ahead of print.

Organ-specific proteomic aging and cognitive performance: Implications for risk prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in older adults

Affiliations
Free article

Organ-specific proteomic aging and cognitive performance: Implications for risk prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in older adults

Sujin Kang et al. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. .
Free article

Abstract

Background and objectives: Biological aging, characterized by cellular and molecular changes, may play a key role in neurodegenerative diseases. While recent proteomic advancements have introduced new aging clocks, widespread validation remains necessary. This study evaluated organ-specific and cognition-enriched proteomic clocks in relation to chronological age and cognitive change.

Methods: We analyzed plasma proteomic data from the CHARIOT PRO SubStudy (N = 409), measured using the SomaScan assay (version 4.1) at four time points over three years (months 0, 12, 24, and 36). Using published proteomic organ age weights, we calculated conventional, organ-specific, and cognition-enriched biological ages and compared them with chronological age. Adjusted multilevel regression analyses assessed associations between baseline proteomic AgeGaps (biological-chronological age differences) and cognitive performance over 54 months.

Results: The cohort (mean age: 71.8 ± 5.5 years; 50.1 % female) showed moderate to strong correlations between proteomic ages and chronological age (r = 0.37-0.80; MAE = 4.2-2.7). Over three years, AgeGaps increased across the conventional, organismal, muscle, liver, artery, and immune systems, ranging from 2.1 ± 1.9 to 1.0 ± 2.3 years. The artery AgeGap was most strongly associated with cognitive decline, with conventional and organismal AgeGaps showing similar patterns. Higher baseline AgeGap z-scores (i.e., greater biological age) in the artery and brain were associated with poorer cognition, as measured by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Total Scores (Coeff. -3.0, 95 % CI: -3.4, -2.5; and -1.1, 95 % CI: -1.5, -0.6) and the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (Coeff. -0.5, 95 % CI: -0.6, -0.4; and -0.14, 95 % CI: -0.3, -0.03).

Conclusions: These findings highlight the interplay between neurological function and cardiovascular aging in cognitive decline. Organ-specific biological age assessments may aid in the early detection of age-related changes, informing personalized interventions. Our study underscores the importance of proteomic aging signatures in elucidating Alzheimer's disease mechanisms and other neurodegenerative conditions, advocating for an integrated approach to brain and cardiovascular health.

Keywords: Biological age; Cognitive changes; Longitudinal validation; Multilevel models; Organ-specific aging; Proteomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interest The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

LinkOut - more resources