Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 12:29:102789.
doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102789. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Characterization of the aroma variances of duck broth from different part by HS-SPME-GC-MS, HS-GC-IMS and sensory evaluation

Affiliations

Characterization of the aroma variances of duck broth from different part by HS-SPME-GC-MS, HS-GC-IMS and sensory evaluation

Boya Cao et al. Food Chem X. .

Abstract

China is the world's largest producer of meat ducks. Decoding the aroma composition of duck broth (DB) produced from different parts can help improve the sensory quality and diversified development of duck meat products. The aroma compounds of DB stewed from seven parts were characterized by solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry, sensory evaluation, odor activity value (OAV) analysis, and partial least squares regression (PLSR) analysis. Two categories including the DB produced from head part and DB produced from the rest of the six parts were divided based on the hierarchical cluster analysis of pleasant (meaty, fatty, savory, and roasted) and unpleasant (bloody, mutton, animal and sour) aroma attributes. A total of 113 aroma compounds were identified, among which aldehydes, alcohols and the nitrogen-containing compound (mainly trimethylamine) were the most abundant. Significant variances were observed among the seven DB samples. The highest total concentration of volatile compounds was observed in from duck leg broth (2924.2 μg/L) and the lowest was duck wing broth (1935.96 μg/L). Thirty aroma compounds with OAVs ≥ 1 in DB were confirmed. Twenty compounds were predicted as the potential compounds contributing to aroma profile differences among seven DBs by PSLR analysis. Considering their higher OAVs and coefficient, hexanal, octanal, nonanal, (E)-2-nonenal, ethyl isovalerate, dimethyl sulfide, and trimethylamine were identified as the differential markers of DBs.

Keywords: Aroma compounds; Duck broth; Gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry; Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; Sensory evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sensory Evaluation results of the DB stewed from different parts of duck meat (a, Radar plots of the results; b, Heat map analysis of the results, A: head, B: back; C: breast; D: wing; E: tail; F: neck; and G: leg).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
HS-GC-IMS results among seven DB samples (a, Topographic plot of HS-GC-IMS; b, Comparison diagram of differences from seven DB samples; A, head; B, back; C, breast; D, wing; E, tail; F, neck; G, leg).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The aroma identification results among different duck broth samples (a, Venn diagram (date of GC-MS and GC-IMS); b, Heat map and cluster analysis of aroma compounds in DB of GC-MS data; c, Heat map and cluster analysis of aroma compounds in DB from different part of duck base on GC-IMS data; DB samples; A, head; B, back; C, breast; D, wing; E, tail; F, neck; G, leg).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Multivariate statistical analysis of aroma profiles by GC-MS and GC-IMS (a, b, PLSR results based on GC-MS and GC-IMS data, respectively; c, d, Variable importance in projection value of aroma compounds based on GC-MS and GC-IMS, respectively.; DB samples; A, head; B, back; C, breast; D, wing; E, tail; F, neck; G, leg).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Multivariate statistical analysis of aroma profiles by GC-MS and GC-IMS (a, b, PLSR results based on GC-MS and GC-IMS data, respectively; c, d, Variable importance in projection value of aroma compounds based on GC-MS and GC-IMS, respectively.; DB samples; A, head; B, back; C, breast; D, wing; E, tail; F, neck; G, leg).

Similar articles

References

    1. Abe K., Hori Y., Myoda T. Characterization of key aroma compounds in aged garlic extract. Food Chemistry. 2020;312 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126081. - DOI - PubMed
    1. An Y., Wen L., Li W., Zhang X., Hu Y., Xiong S. Characterization of warmed-over flavor compounds in surimi gel made from silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) by gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry, aroma extract dilution analysis, aroma recombination, and omission studies. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2022;70(30):9451–9462. - PubMed
    1. Bu N., Yang Q., Chen J., Li Y., Liu D. Characterization and discrimination of volatile compounds in chilled tan mutton meat during storage using HiSorb-TD-GC-MS and E-nose. Molecules. 2023;28(13):4993–5004. doi: 10.3390/molecules28134993. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen X., Luo J., Lou A., Wang Y., Yang D., Shen Q.W. Duck breast muscle proteins, free fatty acids and volatile compounds as affected by curing methods. Food Chemistry. 2021;338 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128138. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fan M., Xiao Q., Xie J., Cheng J., Sun B., Du W., Wang Y., Wang T. Aroma compounds in chicken broths of Beijing youji and commercial broilers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2018;66(39):10242–10251. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b03297. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources