Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Aug;39(8):e70172.
doi: 10.1111/ctr.70172.

Belatacept Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Belatacept Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) to Clinical Outcomes and Compared With Reported BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Belatacept Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Belatacept Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) to Clinical Outcomes and Compared With Reported BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Alexandra Pyatt et al. Clin Transplant. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Belatacept (BELA) pharmacokinetic (PK) studies informed dosing strategies used in phase 3 studies, where fixed mg/kg dosing compared a less intensive (LI) and more intensive (MI) regimen. The LI regimen was preferred due to a better risk/benefit profile. We compared PK parameters observed in the BELA Early Steroid Withdrawal Trial (BEST) with previous reports. BELA trough samples were analyzed using a validated quantitative enzyme-linked immunoassay. Clearance (CL) was estimated with Bayesian estimation using a published BELA population PK model. Significantly higher CL was observed in subjects <60 years old and African American (AA) patients, leading to decreased BELA exposure. No differences in allometrically scaled CL were observed by BMI or sex; however, overall BELA exposure was greater in males. There were no differences in exposure in subjects with rejection; however, subjects with infection had significantly higher exposure. BELA PK was not different between alemtuzumab and rabbit-antithymocyte globulin induction groups without steroids, but overall drug exposure was higher than previously reported in trials co-administering with basiliximab and steroids. Future studies to optimize BELA dosing strategies are warranted as BELA exposure in this analysis exceeded Phase 3 target thresholds. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01729494.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. X. Valencia, An Open‐Label Pharmacokinetic Study in De Novo Renal Transplant Subjects Receiving a Belatacept‐Based Immunosuppressant Regimen (Bristol‐Myers Squibb, 2009).
    1. C. P. Larsen, J. Grinyó, and J. Medina‐Pestana, “Belatacept‐Based Regimens versus a Cyclosporine A‐Based Regimen in Kidney Transplant Recipients: 2‐Year Results From the BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT Studies,” Transplantation 90 (2010): 1528–1535.
    1. F. Vincenti, B. Charpentier, and Y. Vanrenterghem, “A Phase III Study of Belatacept‐Based Immunosuppression Regimens versus Cyclosporine in Renal Transplant Recipients (BENEFIT Study),” American Journal of Transplantation 10 (2010): 535–546.
    1. A. Durrbach, J. M. Pestana, and T. Pearson, “A Phase III Study of Belatacept versus Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplants From Extended Criteria Donors (BENEFIT‐EXT Study),” American Journal of Transplantation 10 (2010): 547–557.
    1. Z. Zhou, J. Shen, Y. Hong, S. Kaul, M. Pfister, and A. Roy, “Time‐Varying Belatacept Exposure and Its Relationship to Efficacy/Safety Responses in Kidney‐Transplant Recipients,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 92 (2012): 251–257.

MeSH terms

Associated data

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources