Guideline of guidelines: PSMA PET in staging newly diagnosed intermediate-risk prostate cancer
- PMID: 40704877
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.16872
Guideline of guidelines: PSMA PET in staging newly diagnosed intermediate-risk prostate cancer
Abstract
Objective: To provide a comprehensive review and analysis of guidelines from various professional and medical organisations regarding the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) as a staging scan for men with newly diagnosed intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
Materials and methods: English-language guidelines and recommendations from the following associations and societies were reviewed and critically analysed: European Association of Urology (EAU), American Urological Association (AUA), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Canadian Urological Association (CUA), American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Society for Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging (SNMMI).
Results: There is significant disagreement among guidelines regarding whether PSMA PET is a useful staging tool for men with a new diagnosis of intermediate-risk PCa. There is a stronger consensus that PSMA PET is useful in staging high-risk PCa.
Conclusion: Whilst there is a growing body of evidence that supports the use of PSMA PET in newly diagnosed PCa, there is significant disagreement regarding its use for men with intermediate-risk disease. Recommendations are generally weak and based on expert opinions. This is an area of considerable ongoing research, and guidelines are likely to change as new evidence emerges.
Keywords: Guidelines; Intermediate‐Risk; PSMA PET; Prostate Cancer; Staging.
© 2025 The Author(s). BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.
Similar articles
-
Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Feb;5(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Sep 17. Eur Urol Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34538770
-
Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol. 2023 Jul;84(1):36-48. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.001. Epub 2023 Apr 7. Eur Urol. 2023. PMID: 37032189
-
The value of FDG positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) in pre-operative staging of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2011 Sep;15(35):1-192, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15350. Health Technol Assess. 2011. PMID: 21958472 Free PMC article.
-
SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Brain [18F]FDG PET Imaging, Version 2.0.J Nucl Med. 2025 Jun 6;66(Suppl 2):S45-S60. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268754. J Nucl Med. 2025. PMID: 39419552
-
The Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Primary and Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):942-957. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Sep 15. Eur Urol Focus. 2022. PMID: 34538633
References
-
- Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ et al. Prostate‐specific membrane antigen PET‐CT in patients with high‐risk prostate cancer before curative‐intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet 2020; 395: 1208–1216
-
- Mazzone E, Cannoletta D, Quarta L et al. A comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis of the role of prostate‐specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography for prostate cancer diagnosis and primary staging before definitive treatment. Eur Urol 2025; 87: 654–671
-
- Holzgreve A, Unterrainer M, Calais J et al. Is PSMA PET/CT cost‐effective for the primary staging in prostate cancer? First results for European countries and the USA based on the proPSMA trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50: 3750–3754
-
- de Feria Cardet RE, Hofman MS, Segard T et al. Is prostate‐specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging cost‐effective in prostate cancer: An analysis informed by the proPSMA trial. Eur Urol 2021; 79: 413–418
-
- Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al. EAU‐EANM‐ESTRO‐ESUR‐ISUP‐SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Arnhem, The Netherlands: EAU Guidelines Office, 2024. https://d56bochluxqnz.cloudfront.net/documents/full‐guideline/EAU‐EANM‐E...
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous