Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2522740.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22740.

Microbiota Transplantation Among Patients Receiving Long-Term Care: The Sentinel REACT Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Microbiota Transplantation Among Patients Receiving Long-Term Care: The Sentinel REACT Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Michael H Woodworth et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Intestinal multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization is highly prevalent in long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) patients and is associated with MDRO infection and transmission. However, there are no therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce intestinal MDRO colonization.

Objective: To determine the safety and acceptability of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in LTACH patients.

Design, setting, and participants: This single-center, open-label nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted from April to December 2023 at an LTACH in the Southeastern US with median 50-patient census and 28-day length of stay. Patients with MDRO colonization were identified by perirectal prevalence sampling. Patients colonized with at least 1 target MDRO were approached for informed consent for FMT. FMT recipients were compared with untreated controls with MDRO colonization. Data were analyzed from August 2024 to May 2025.

Intervention: Healthy donor fecal microbiota (50-100 g stool and 250 mL normal saline with 9% glycerol) instilled via gastrostomy tube or enema without antibiotic or bowel preparation conditioning.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was frequency and severity of adverse events. Solicited adverse events were recorded for 7 days. Unsolicited adverse events were recorded for 6 months. Four weekly perirectal MDRO cultures were performed after FMT.

Results: A total of 42 patients, including 10 (mean [SD] age, 63.8 (14.5) years; 7 [70%] female) who received FMT and 32 contemporaneous controls (mean [SD] age, 64.0 [13.7] years; 13 [41%] female) were assessed. In 2 prevalence surveys, 23 of 32 (72%) and 26 of 34 (77%) perirectal cultures grew at least 1 MDRO. Among the FMT group, 5 patients received FMT via gastrostomy alone, 4 via enema alone, and 1 with both routes more than 30 days apart. No serious adverse events were attributed to FMT, and post-FMT solicited adverse events were mild. At final visit, all perirectal cultures from FMT recipients grew at least 1 MDRO. Post hoc analyses found numerically fewer FMT recipients had positive blood culture results (0 individuals vs 6 individuals [19%]; P = .31), pathogen intestinal dominance (2 of 8 individuals [25%] vs 4 of 8 individuals [50%]; P = .61), and 7 fewer days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 patient days (median [IQR], 12.6 [0-25.2] days vs 19.7 [6.5-36.1] days; P = .38) compared with controls in the 6 months after prevalence survey, although these differences were not statistically significant. Accounting for higher baseline FMT recipient antibiotic use, difference-in-differences analysis estimated 26 (95% CI, -64 to 12) fewer days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 patient-days after FMT, although this difference was also not statistically significant.

Conclusions and relevance: In this nonrandomized pilot clinical trial, FMT was acceptable for LTACH patients without related serious adverse events. Although not powered to test these outcomes, this study found potential reductions in bacteremia, intestinal pathogen domination, and antibiotic use associated with FMT, suggesting FMT should be evaluated in larger, randomized trials.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05780801.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Babiker reported receiving personal fees from Beckman Coulter and grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flowchart of Participant Recruitment, Treatment Allocation, and Analysis
Controls were admitted to the same facility at the same time and underwent peri-rectal cultures but did not meet inclusion criteria or declined to participate and did not receive fecal microbiota transplant (FMT). Metagenomic exploratory outcome group was a subset of the controls with culture results positive for multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) analyzed in the infection exploratory outcome group.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Perirectal Multidrug-Resistant Organism (MDRO) Culture Results by Visit Among 10 Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) Recipients
APPS indicates Antimicrobial Resistance Point Prevalence Sampling Protocol; CRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; ESBL, extended-spectrum β-lactamase; FMT, fecal microbiota transplant; MDRP, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas; VRE, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. MDRO detection is a summary of composite detection of all MDRO categories.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Blood Culture and Microbiome Trends After Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT)
FMT recipients (n = 10) had a more stable α diversity (A) and decrease in number of participants with pathogen intestinal microbiome dominance (note multiple FMT doses are made from individual stool specimens) (B) compared with untreated contemporaneous controls (n = 32), although these differences were not statistically significant. FMT recipients also had fewer positive blood culture results in the 6 months after prevalence survey (C and D) compared with controls with MDRO-positive blood culture results by perirectal prevalence survey but did not receive FMT, although these differences were not statistically significant. A, The horizontal axis for FMT doses indicates aliquots from 2 donors that represent the 11 administered doses. Metagenomic analysis (A and B) controls were all individuals who were admitted on both prevalence surveys 35 days apart under the Antimicrobial Resistance Point Prevalence Sampling protocol (n = 8).

References

    1. Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, et al. ; Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators . Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629-655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.; National Center for Emerging Zoonotic and Infectious Diseases; National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention; National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases . Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2019.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; US Food and Drug Administration . Drug development considerations for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections. August 30, 2022. Accessed February 3, 2025. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/drug-development-consi...
    1. Shimasaki T, Seekatz A, Bassis C, et al. ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epicenters Program . Increased relative abundance of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase–producing Klebsiella pneumoniae within the gut microbiota is associated with risk of bloodstream infection in long-term acute care hospital patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(12):2053-2059. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy796 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taur Y, Xavier JB, Lipuma L, et al. Intestinal domination and the risk of bacteremia in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(7):905-914. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis580 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data