Cost per Opioid-Free Year: A Systematic Review and Summary Analysis
- PMID: 40706703
- PMCID: PMC12406688
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.008
Cost per Opioid-Free Year: A Systematic Review and Summary Analysis
Abstract
Objectives: Opioids remain a leading cause of death in the United States, and time free from opioid use is a common measure of effectiveness in economic evaluations of opioid use disorder (OUD) interventions. This study reviews the economic evaluation literature on OUD, identifies studies that calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) based on time free from opioids, and establishes a benchmark for comparison in future research.
Methods: The review examined economic evaluations of OUD interventions published in the peer-reviewed literature from inception to September 2024. ICERs of cost per period of opioid-free time were extracted or calculated from studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Monetary values were converted to 2024 USD and ICERs normalized to cost per opioid-free year (OfY). Articles were classified by intervention location (United States vs international) and economic perspective.
Results: Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria: 8 from the United States, 4 from Australia, 1 from Malaysia, and 1 from the United Kingdom. Among the US-based studies, the average ICER per OfY for the healthcare-sector, the state policymaker, and the societal perspective were $243 053/OfY, $17 674/OfY, and $32 125/OfY, respectively. For international studies, average ICERs for the healthcare-sector and societal perspectives were $79 765/OfY and $195 980/OfY, respectively.
Conclusions: Cost per OfY is a widely used metric in economic evaluations because of its relative importance as a measure of clinical effectiveness. However, a universally accepted benchmark for decision making does not yet exist. This review aggregates data from existing studies that provided this measure, offering an initial step for establishing a cost-effectiveness threshold for cost per OfY.
Keywords: cost per opioid-free year; cost-effectiveness analysis; economic evaluation; opioid use disorder.
Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Author Disclosures Author disclosure forms can be accessed below in the Supplemental Material section.
Similar articles
-
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks.2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2025 Jul 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 30726003 Free Books & Documents.
-
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16796930
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Oral naltrexone as a treatment for relapse prevention in formerly opioid-dependent drug users: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Feb;11(6):iii-iv, 1-85. doi: 10.3310/hta11060. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17280624
-
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for advanced heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(38):1-237. doi: 10.3310/MLFA4009. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 39189844 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Overdose Deaths Decrease in 2023, First Time Since 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2024/20240515.htm Accessed 10/28/2024.
-
- Cernasev A, Hohmeier KC, Frederick K, Jasmin H, Gatwood J. A systematic literature review of patient perspectives of barriers and facilitators to access, adherence, stigma, and persistence to treatment for substance use disorder. Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy. 2021;2:100029. - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous