Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;66(4):e70058.
doi: 10.1111/vru.70058.

Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Signs for the Detection of Severe Adhesions in Dogs with Abdominal Masses

Lauren A O'Mara  1 , Anthony J Fischetti  1 , Daniel I Spector  2 , Joel G Weltman  3
Affiliations

Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Signs for the Detection of Severe Adhesions in Dogs with Abdominal Masses

Lauren A O'Mara et al. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

The preoperative detection of abdominal adhesions could influence surgical planning; however, imaging features of abdominal adhesions are minimally described in the veterinary literature. The purpose of this retrospective, diagnostic case-control study is to determine the preoperative CT imaging signs associated with surgically-confirmed, severe adhesions in dogs with abdominal masses. Dogs undergoing contrast-enhanced CT and surgery for abdominal masses from 2012 to 2022 were included in the study. Surgical records were evaluated and retrospectively reviewed by a board-certified surgeon to determine the severity of adhesions as pertaining to surgical planning and/or complications. The CTs of dogs with severe adhesions were mixed with age and weight-matched controls for review by a board-certified veterinary radiologist. A review of the literature on both people and animals determined the imaging features tested. The signs tested were fat stranding, fat stranding with vascular enhancement or vascular crowding, loss of fat planes (properitoneal fat sign), focal peritoneal enhancement with or without an alteration in visceral contour, loculation of fluid, and enhancing peritoneal bands. The presence of fat stranding (sensitivity 60.5; specificity 72.1), fat stranding with vascular enhancement (sensitivity 53.5, specificity 81.4), and loculation of peritoneal effusion (sensitivity 25.5; specificity 95.3) were significantly associated with the presence of adhesions at surgery. Loculation of peritoneal effusion surrounding the nondependent margin of an abdominal mass can alert imagers to the presence of severe adhesions. The absence of any of the signs tested does not exclude the presence of adhesions, especially in the retroperitoneum.

Keywords: complications; fibrous bands; loculation; misty mesentery; surgical planning; tumors.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. N. Tabibian, E. Swehli, A. Boyd, A. Umbreen, and J. H. Tabibian, “Abdominal Adhesions: A Practical Review of an Often Overlooked Entity,” Annals of Medicine and Surgery 15 (2017): 9–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.01.021.
    1. N. P. Ghonge and S. D. Ghonge, “Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Pelvic Peritoneal Adhesions: What Radiologists Need to Know?,” Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 24, no. 02 (2014): 149–155, https://doi.org/10.4103/0971‐3026.134400.
    1. H. Osada, W. Watanabe, H. Ohno, et al., “Multidetector CT Appearance of Adhesion‐Induced Small Bowel Obstructions: Matted Adhesions versus Single Adhesive Bands,” Japanese Journal of Radiology 30, no. 9 (2012): 706–712, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604‐012‐0121‐4.
    1. J.‐A. P. Attard and A. R. MacLean, “Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: Epidemiology, Biology and Prevention,” Canadian Journal of Surgery 50, no. 4 (2007): 291–300.
    1. J. Lang, D. Ma, Y. Xiang, et al., “Chinese Expert Consensus on the Prevention of Abdominal Pelvic Adhesions After Gynecological Tumor Surgeries,” Annals of Translational Medicine 8, no. 4 (2020): 79–79, doi:10.21037/atm.2020.02.