Predicting outcomes following endovascular aortoiliac revascularization using machine learning
- PMID: 40707760
- PMCID: PMC12289885
- DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01865-y
Predicting outcomes following endovascular aortoiliac revascularization using machine learning
Abstract
Endovascular aortoiliac revascularization is a common treatment option for peripheral artery disease that carries non-negligible risks. Outcome prediction tools may support clinical decision-making but remain limited. We developed machine learning algorithms that predict 30-day post-procedural outcomes. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted vascular database was used to identify patients who underwent endovascular aortoiliac revascularization between 2011-2021. Input features included 37 pre-operative demographic/clinical variables. The primary outcome was 30-day post-procedural major adverse limb event (MALE) or death. Data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Using 10-fold cross-validation, 6 machine learning models were trained using pre-operative features. Overall, 6601 patients were included, and 30-day MALE/death occurred in 470 (7.1%) individuals. The best-performing model was XGBoost, achieving an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.94 (0.93-0.95). In comparison, logistic regression had an AUROC (95% CI) of 0.74 (0.73-0.76). The XGBoost model accurately predicted 30-day post-procedural outcomes, performing better than logistic regression.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                 
              
              
              
              
                
                
                References
- 
    - Fowkes, F. G. R. et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet Lond. Engl.382, 1329–1340 (2013). - PubMed
 
- 
    - Agnelli, G., Belch, J. J. F., Baumgartner, I., Giovas, P. & Hoffmann, U. Morbidity and mortality associated with atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease: a systematic review. Atherosclerosis293, 94–100 (2020). - PubMed
 
- 
    - Kohn, C. G., Alberts, M. J., Peacock, W. F., Bunz, T. J. & Coleman, C. I. Cost and inpatient burden of peripheral artery disease: findings from the National Inpatient Sample. Atherosclerosis286, 142–146 (2019). - PubMed
 
- 
    - Heaton, J. & Khan, Y. S. Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease. in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL), 2022). - PubMed
 
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
 
        