Evaluating the learning curve of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with the cumulative sum method
- PMID: 40707816
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02599-5
Evaluating the learning curve of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with the cumulative sum method
Abstract
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become the standard treatment for small renal tumors, offering better perioperative outcomes than open surgery. However, objective evaluations of the RAPN learning curve are limited. While the Trifecta criteria-comprising negative surgical margins, no perioperative complications, and warm ischemia time (WIT) ≤ 25 min-are commonly used to assess surgical outcomes, they are inadequate for continuous proficiency assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the RAPN learning curve using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method based on Trifecta achievement and its components. We retrospectively analyzed 119 RAPN cases performed by three surgeons at a single institution between 2017 and 2022. All surgeons (≥ 30 cases; ≥ 15 year experience) were included. CUSUM charts were created using Trifecta achievement rates with thresholds (p₀ = 0.4, p₁ = 0.8), and further analysis was performed on individual components. Distinct learning curve transitions were observed only in Surgeon B, with proficiency achieved at the 9th case for complication rates and the 4th case for overall Trifecta achievement. No clear transitions were seen in WIT or surgical margins, or in any component for Surgeons A and C. These findings suggest that Surgeons A and C may have already attained proficiency before the study period. The CUSUM method offers a practical tool for visualizing and quantifying individual learning curves in RAPN based on clinically relevant criteria. Despite some limitations, CUSUM enables continuous, surgeon-specific assessment. Future studies should integrate additional metrics to develop more comprehensive training programs and improve surgical safety and outcomes.
Keywords: CUSUM method; Education; Learning curve; RAPN; Trifecta.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nagoya City University (IRB No. 60–22-0101). Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained through an opt-out process on the website. Consent to publish: Not applicable.
Similar articles
-
Clinical efficacy and learning curve analysis of 101 robotic-assisted Warshaw procedures: a retrospective study.Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul;39(7):4177-4185. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11790-6. Epub 2025 May 15. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40372447 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Reporting Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy.J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):893-909. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0351. Epub 2017 Mar 29. J Endourol. 2017. PMID: 27305835
-
Learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy surgery via the transperitoneal approach: a CUSUM analysis.J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 14;19(1):483. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02610-z. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40810885 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and classical open partial nephrectomy.Int J Surg. 2024 Oct 1;110(10):6268-6281. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001324. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38573087 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes in single-port and multi-port retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 29;19(1):184. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02357-7. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40299248
References
-
- Xia L, Wang X, Xu T, Guzzo TJ (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies reporting perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 31(9):893–909. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0351 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chen XB, Li YG, Wu T et al (2023) Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for special types of renal tumors (hilar, endophytic, or cystic): an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes. Front Oncol 13:1178592. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1178592 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Bignante G, Orsini A, Lasorsa F et al (2024) Robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of urologic cancers: recent advances. Expert Rev Med Devices 21(12):1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2435546 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lasorsa F, Bignante G, Orsini A et al (2024) Partial nephrectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 50(10):108578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108578 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kikuchi E, Yamamoto H, Yasui T et al (2024) The first detailed annual record on the National Clinical Database Urology Division in Japan: a report on five surgical procedures. Int J Urol 31(12):1344–1355. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15561 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical