Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 24;19(1):46.
doi: 10.1186/s13031-025-00692-y.

What works and who knows? The importance of community and health worker perspectives in defining solutions to attacks on healthcare1,2,3,4

Affiliations

What works and who knows? The importance of community and health worker perspectives in defining solutions to attacks on healthcare1,2,3,4

Samuel Lwamushi Makali et al. Confl Health. .

Abstract

Attacks against healthcare are increasingly a strategy of modern warfare, with devastating short and long-term impacts on health staff, patients, and the health system as a whole. What is the solution? Communities play a significant role in protecting healthcare in war zones, as do health workers and civil society networks. We argue existing methods can help identify operationally-relevant solutions in a timely way, facilitating response strategies co-designed with those most affected and in support of existing capacities. This commentary draws on three studies in Nigeria, South Sudan, and Democratic Republic of Congo (2022-2024) that examined health worker and community perspectives on attacks on healthcare and about response priorities in order to inform strategies to prevent attacks and reduce their impact. Here we identify two additional contributions of this research approach. First, these studies document contextually-relevant responses of community- and health worker-defined actions and priorities. Second, they provide new insights on how health worker and community perspectives can be gathered in a timely way, considering the many competing priorities of health workers and people exposed to conflict. They elicited what affected people prioritise, when asked. As such, the approaches are relevant for operational actors working in all areas where people face systematic violence against healthcare.

Keywords: Attacks on healthcare; Community perspectives; Conflict; DRC; Healthcare workers; Impact; Nigeria; Participatory approaches; South Sudan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Safeguarding Conflict in Health Coalition and Insecurity Insight, Epidemic of Violence: Violence against Health Care in Conflict, 2024. https://insecurityinsight.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2024-SHCC-Annua.... Accessed 5 July 2025.
    1. Safeguarding Conflict in Health Coalition and Insecurity Insight, Epidemic of Violence: Violence against Health Care in Conflict, 2024: Myanmar data. https://insecurityinsight.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2024-SHCC-Annua.... Accessed 5 July 2025.
    1. WHO, Ukraine witnessing increasing impact of attacks on health and education. 7 February 2024. https://www.who.int/azerbaijan/news/item/07-02-2024-ukraine-witnessing-i.... Accessed 5 July 2024.
    1. Physicians for Human Rights, Physicians for Human Rights’ Findings of Attacks on Health Care in Syria. 2024. https://syriamap.phr.org/#/en/findings. Accessed 5 July 2024.
    1. MSF, Strikes, raids and incursions: Seven months of relentless attacks on healthcare in Palestine. 2024. https://www.msf.org/strikes-raids-and-incursions-seven-months-relentless.... Accessed 5 July 2024.

LinkOut - more resources