Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 15;20(8):1817-1827.
doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5c00329. Epub 2025 Jul 24.

Harnessing Nanobodies for Precision Targeting of Proteoforms: Opportunities and Challenges in Therapeutics and Diagnostics

Affiliations
Review

Harnessing Nanobodies for Precision Targeting of Proteoforms: Opportunities and Challenges in Therapeutics and Diagnostics

Elise M Van Fossen et al. ACS Chem Biol. .

Abstract

Proteoforms are biologically distinct yet structurally similar proteins that play key roles in driving disease progression but are rarely accounted for in the development of therapeutics and diagnostics. Nanobodies (Nbs) have emerged as a therapeutic and diagnostic "silver bullet" as they possess unique structural and functional attributes that offer advantages over traditional antibodies. One of the most profound advantages of Nbs is the heightened sensitivity and ability to distinguish subtle changes in the conformation of a given protein. Thus, Nbs have significant potential as therapeutic and diagnostic agents that can identify and distinguish specific pathological proteoforms that underlie a given disease. However, there remain significant challenges in obtaining sufficient quantities and purities of specific proteoform antigens that are required for engineering proteoform-specific Nbs. Recent advancements in chemical biology tools for precision proteoform synthesis have made this task feasible for the first time. In this perspective, we discuss the advantages and challenges associated with developing proteoform-specific Nbs and how success in this endeavor will significantly advance the fields of therapeutics and diagnostics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

1
1
(A) The structures of conventional antibodies (left) compared with a heavy-chain-only antibody (HCAb) from camelid (center) and the variable heavy chain fragment of the HCAb known as a “nanobody” (right). (B) Detailed structure of a nanobody is shown, including CDRs (colored regions) (PDB ID: 1I3V).
2
2
Overview of human proteoform production. Human genes (DNA) are transcribed into RNA, which undergoes processing and splicing to produce alternatively spliced mRNAs (1-typical splicing, 2-mutually exclusive exons/exon skipping, 3-intron retention). The resulting variants are translated into initial proteoforms, which can then undergo post-translational modifications, producing further proteoforms.
3
3
Comparison of traditional Nb development workflows versus proteoform-targeted strategies. The left panel illustrates the conventional process for generating nanobodies against general protein targets, while the right panel outlines a workflow optimized for developing nanobodies specific to proteoforms such as post-translationally modified proteins. (1) Target identification: traditional methods permit flexible target selection, whereas proteoform targeting requires the identification of specific modifications via mass spectrometry. (2) Antigen production: standard antigens are produced through recombinant expression or enrichment from cells, but proteoform-specific antigens necessitate precise chemical biology approaches. (3) Library selection: conventional workflows prioritize positive selection against the antigen, while proteoform workflows require both positive and negative selections to discriminate between modified and unmodified forms. (4) Nanobody validation: for traditional targets, validation emphasizes affinity and specificity; for proteoforms, validation must also assess selectivity between modified and unmodified variants.

References

    1. Yang E. Y., Shah K.. Nanobodies: Next Generation of Cancer Diagnostics and Therapeutics. Front. Oncol. 2020;10:1182. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01182. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jin B. K., Odongo S., Radwanska M., Magez S.. NANOBODIES­(R): A Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24(6):5994. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065994. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mir M. A., Mehraj U., Sheikh B. A., Hamdani S. S.. Nanobodies: The “Magic Bullets” in therapeutics, drug delivery and diagnostics. Hum. Antibodies. 2020;28(1):29–51. doi: 10.3233/HAB-190390. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ruiz-Lopez E., Schuhmacher A. J.. Transportation of Single-Domain Antibodies through the Blood-Brain Barrier. Biomolecules. 2021;11(8):1131. doi: 10.3390/biom11081131. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zottel A., Jovcevska I., Samec N., Mlakar J., Sribar J., Krizaj I., Skoblar Vidmar M., Komel R.. Anti-vimentin, anti-TUFM, anti-NAP1L1 and anti-DPYSL2 nanobodies display cytotoxic effect and reduce glioblastoma cell migration. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2020;12:1758835920915302. doi: 10.1177/1758835920915302. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances