Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Review of Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes
- PMID: 40710004
- PMCID: PMC12293286
- DOI: 10.3390/diseases13070214
Neoadjuvant Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Review of Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes
Abstract
The incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is continuing to rise globally, while overall survival continues to be poor. Margin-negative (R0) surgical resection is essential to improve patient outcomes. With increasing understanding of the importance of anatomy and biology to establishing the resectability of PDAC, neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has emerged as an important strategy to achieve an R0 resection, particularly for those with borderline resectable (BR-PDAC) and locally advanced disease (LA-PDAC). However, despite the multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in recent years, the optimum regime has yet to be fully established. The role of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) remains controversial, possibly allowing for improved local disease control at a potential cost of interrupting systemic treatment. The emergence of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), in place of conventional radiation therapy, improves patient tolerance of NAT and may improve local tumour control for patients with PDAC during limited fractions, minimising systemic therapy interruption. A particular niche for SABR may be as part of NAT for LA-PDAC, potentially converting a minority of patients with favourable biology to allow for resection. While pancreaticoduodenectomy can be technically challenging following NAT, there is no difference in the rate of major morbidity or mortality post operatively. Indeed, post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rates may be lower following NAT. Overall, however, evidence for SABR in a neoadjuvant setting for BR- and LA-PDAC remains sparse.
Keywords: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; pancreaticoduodenectomy; stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Advances in neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: Current trends and future directions.World J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun 24;16(6):105849. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i6.105849. World J Clin Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40585822 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 7;(4):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8:CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub3. PMID: 25847525 Updated.
-
Neoadjuvant Therapy or Upfront Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer-To Whom, When, and How?Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 6;17(15):2584. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152584. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40805279 Free PMC article. Review.
-
FDG-PET Predicts Neoadjuvant Therapy Response and Survival in Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Sep;20(9):1023-1032.e3. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7041. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022. PMID: 36075389 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for patients with borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e050558. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050558. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35831044 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abboud Y., Samaan J.S., Oh J., Jiang Y., Randhawa N., Lew D., Ghaith J., Pala P., Leyson C., Watson R., et al. Increasing Pancreatic Cancer Incidence in Young Women in the United States: A Population-Based Time-Trend Analysis, 2001–2018. Gastroenterology. 2023;164:978–989. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.01.022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials