Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 21;15(7):468.
doi: 10.3390/bios15070468.

Electrochemical (Bio)Sensors for Toxins, Foodborne Pathogens, Pesticides, and Antibiotics Detection: Recent Advances and Challenges in Food Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Electrochemical (Bio)Sensors for Toxins, Foodborne Pathogens, Pesticides, and Antibiotics Detection: Recent Advances and Challenges in Food Analysis

Marta Feroci et al. Biosensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Food safety plays an important and fundamental role, primarily for human health and certainly for the food industry. In this context, developing efficient, highly sensitive, safe, inexpensive, and fast analytical methods for determining chemical and biological contaminants, such as electrochemical (bio)sensors, is crucial. The development of innovative and high-performance electrochemical (bio)sensors can significantly support food chain monitoring. In this review, we have surveyed and analyzed the latest examples of electrochemical (bio)sensors for the analysis of some common biological contaminants, such as toxins and pathogenic bacteria and chemical contaminants, such as pesticides, and antibiotics.

Keywords: antibiotics; electrochemical biosensors; food; foodborne pathogens; pesticides; safety; toxins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Classification of the different types of (bio)sensors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The electrochemical techniques used for biosensing applications.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic illustration of the biosensor used to determine OTA and AFB1. Reprinted with permission from [61]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Scheme showing the process of synthesizing the Bi2S3@CNF nanocomposite and the working mechanism of the electrochemical sensor. Reprinted with permission from [65]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Scheme illustrating the assembly and the working mechanism of the electrochemical biosensor. Reprinted with permission from [72]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Scheme illustrating the assembly and the working mechanism of the portable immunosensor. Reprinted with permission from [83]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Scheme illustrating the synthesis of the PDA@ZnMoO4/MXene composite and the determination procedure of Listeria monocytogenes. Reprinted with permission from [93]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Scheme illustrating the biosensor assembling and the determination procedure of Salmonella. Reprinted with permission from [107]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Scheme illustrating the aptasensor development and detection mechanism of E. coli. Reprinted with permission from [117]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Scheme illustrating the composite synthesis, the sensor development and the detection approach of DFC. Reprinted with permission from [128]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Scheme illustrating the composite synthesis, the sensor development and the detection approach of DDVP. Reprinted with permission from [134]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Scheme showing the composite synthesis, the sensor development and the detection approach of OTC. Reprinted with permission from [145]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Scheme showing the sensor development and the detection approach of TC. Reprinted with permission from [159]. Copyright 2024, Elsevier.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Scheme illustrating the sensor development and the detection approach of E. coli. Reprinted with permission from [162]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier.

Similar articles

References

    1. Curulli A. Electrochemical Biosensors in Food Safety: Challenges and Perspectives. Molecules. 2021;26:2940. doi: 10.3390/molecules26102940. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang K., Lin X., Zhang M., Li Y., Luo C., Wu J. Review of Electrochemical Biosensors for Food Safety Detection. Biosensors. 2022;12:959. doi: 10.3390/bios12110959. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shruti A., Bage N., Kar P. Nanomaterials based sensors for analysis of food safety. Food Chem. 2024;433:137284. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137284. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . WHO Global Strategy for Food Safety 2022–2030: Towards Stronger Food Safety Systems and Global Cooperation. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2022. [(accessed on 24 March 2025)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240057685.
    1. International Finance Corporation . Food Safety Handbook: A Practical Guide for Building a Robust Food Safety Management System. World Bank; Washington, DC, USA: 2020. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources