Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 20;13(7):276.
doi: 10.3390/dj13070276.

Compatibility of Dual-Cure Core Materials with Self-Etching Adhesives

Affiliations

Compatibility of Dual-Cure Core Materials with Self-Etching Adhesives

Zachary K Greene et al. Dent J (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: A material incompatibility has been established between self-etching adhesives and amine-containing dual-cure resin composite materials used for core buildups. This study aims to compare the dentin bond strength of several amine-containing and amine-free core materials using self-etching adhesives with different pHs. Methods: Extracted human molars were mounted in acrylic and ground flat with 320-grit silicon carbide paper. Next, 520 specimens (n = 10/group) were assigned to a dual-cure core buildup material group (10 amine-containing, 2 amine-free, and 1 reference light-cure only bulk fill flowable composite) and assigned to a self-etching adhesive subgroup (pH levels of approximately 1.0, 3.0, and 4.0). Within 4 h of surface preparation, the adhesive corresponding to the specimen's subgroup was applied and light-cured. Composite buttons for the assigned dual-cure core material of each group were placed using a bonding clamp apparatus, allowed to self-cure for 2 h at 37 °C, and then unclamped. An additional group with one adhesive (pH = 3.0) was prepared in which the dual-cure core materials were light-cured. The bonded specimens were stored in water at 37 °C for 24 h. The specimens were mounted on a testing clamp and de-bonded in a universal testing machine with a load applied to a circular notched-edge blade at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until bond failure. The maximum load divided by the area of the button was recorded as the shear bond strength. The data was analyzed via 2-way ANOVA. Results: The analysis of bond strength via 2-way ANOVA determined statistically significant differences between the adhesives, the core materials, and their interaction (p < 0.01). There was a general trend in shear bond strength for the adhesives, where pH 4.0 > 3.0 > 1.0. The amine-free core materials consistently demonstrated higher shear bond strengths as compared to the other core materials when chemically cured only. Light-curing improved bond strength for some materials with perceived incompatibility. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that an incompatibility can exist between self-etching adhesives and dual-cure resin composite core materials. A decrease in the pH of the utilized adhesive corresponded to a decrease in the bond strength of dual-cure core materials when self-curing. This incompatibility may be minimized with the use of core materials formulated with amine-free chemistry. Alternatively, the dual-cure core materials may be light-cured.

Keywords: core buildup; self-etch adhesive; shear bond strength; universal adhesive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Lawson has had honorarium and/or research grants with Solventum, Dentsply, Pulpdent, Danville, Premier, Clinicians Choice, DMG, Ivoclar, and Voco. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ultradent shear bond strength apparatus (left); Button of core material bonded to the tooth specimen (center); Circular notched-edge blade for applying load to the button (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example failure modes: Adhesive (top left), Cohesive within tooth (bottom left), Cohesive within core materials (top left), Cohesive within core and tooth (bottom right).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Shear bond strength (average ± standard deviation) of dual-cure resin composite core materials using different adhesive systems. * Light-cure only control group in which core was light-cured for all groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Manning K.E., Yu D.C., Yu H.C., Kwan E.W. Factors to consider for predictable post and core buildups of endodontically treated teeth. Part I: Basic theoretical concepts. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 1995;61:693–695. - PubMed
    1. Manning K.E., Yu D.C., Yu H.C., Kwan E.W. Factors to consider for predictable post and core buildups of endodontically treated teeth. Part II: Clinical application of basic concepts. J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 1995;61:696–701. - PubMed
    1. Zarow M., Dominiak M., Szczeklik K., Hardan L., Bourgi R., Cuevas-Suárez C.E., Zamarripa-Calderón J.E., Kharouf N., Filtchev D. Effect of composite core materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Polymers. 2021;13:2251. doi: 10.3390/polym13142251. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kwon T.Y., Bagheri R., Kim Y.K., Kim K.H., Burrow M.F. Cure mechanisms in materials for use in esthetic dentistry. J. Investig. Clin. Dent. 2012;3:3–16. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00114.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sofan E., Sofan A., Palaia G., Tenore G., Romeo U., Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: From the IV generation to the universal type. Ann. Stomatol. 2017;8:1–17. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources