Effect of Prior Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis on the Calibration Accuracy of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Direct Comparative Study
- PMID: 40710418
- PMCID: PMC12298583
- DOI: 10.3390/jpm15070301
Effect of Prior Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis on the Calibration Accuracy of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Direct Comparative Study
Abstract
Background: Personalized precision medicine has become a prevailing trend and applies to the selection of intraocular lenses (IOLs) for cataract surgery based on the unique corneal morphology of each person. The choice of presbyopia-correcting IOLs for post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) cataract surgery is a significant concern. However, few direct comparison studies exist between eyes with and without LASIK history. We analyzed the performance of extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL implantation in these two groups. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we included patients with or without previous LASIK who underwent cataract surgery and EDOF Symfony IOL implantation, with ≥1 follow up. All patients underwent optical biometry using the IOLMaster. IOL power was calculated using the Sanders Retzslaff Kraff/theoretical and Haigis-L formulas for patients without and with LASIK, respectively. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), refraction, and corneal tomography were recorded. The prediction error was the absolute difference between the postoperative sphere and target refraction. The right eyes of patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected for analysis. Results: Among the 321 recruited eyes, 18 underwent previous LASIK. After 1:3 age/sex matching, 17 LASIK and 49 non-LASIK eyes from 66 patients were analyzed. No significant preoperative differences existed in target refraction, spherical equivalent, or best-corrected visual acuity. All surgical procedures were uneventful. LASIK exhibited non-inferiority to non-LASIK for predictive refraction error and UNVA. An age/sex-matched regression analysis indicated no UDVA superiority between the two groups. Conclusions: Previous LASIK may have no discernible effect on the visual performance of presbyopia-correcting EDOF IOLs with respect to the absolute refractive error, UNVA, and UDVA. Longer follow-up and larger-scale studies are required to further validate these results.
Keywords: absolute prediction error; cataract; extended depth of focus; laser in situ keratomileusis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Trifocal versus extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses after cataract extraction.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 10;7(7):CD014891. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014891.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38984608 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical interventions for presbyopia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 14;4(4):CD015711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015711.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40226888
-
Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 27;1(1):CD012648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012648.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36705482 Free PMC article.
-
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 15;2(2):CD011080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011080.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28197998 Free PMC article.
-
Accommodative intraocular lens versus standard monofocal intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 1;2014(5):CD009667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009667.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 24788900 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abulafia A., Hill W.E., Koch D.D., Wang L., Barrett G.D. Accuracy of the Barrett True-K formula for intraocular lens power prediction after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2016;42:363–369. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.039. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous