Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 10;15(7):301.
doi: 10.3390/jpm15070301.

Effect of Prior Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis on the Calibration Accuracy of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Direct Comparative Study

Affiliations

Effect of Prior Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis on the Calibration Accuracy of Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Direct Comparative Study

I-Hung Lin et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Background: Personalized precision medicine has become a prevailing trend and applies to the selection of intraocular lenses (IOLs) for cataract surgery based on the unique corneal morphology of each person. The choice of presbyopia-correcting IOLs for post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) cataract surgery is a significant concern. However, few direct comparison studies exist between eyes with and without LASIK history. We analyzed the performance of extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL implantation in these two groups. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we included patients with or without previous LASIK who underwent cataract surgery and EDOF Symfony IOL implantation, with ≥1 follow up. All patients underwent optical biometry using the IOLMaster. IOL power was calculated using the Sanders Retzslaff Kraff/theoretical and Haigis-L formulas for patients without and with LASIK, respectively. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), refraction, and corneal tomography were recorded. The prediction error was the absolute difference between the postoperative sphere and target refraction. The right eyes of patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected for analysis. Results: Among the 321 recruited eyes, 18 underwent previous LASIK. After 1:3 age/sex matching, 17 LASIK and 49 non-LASIK eyes from 66 patients were analyzed. No significant preoperative differences existed in target refraction, spherical equivalent, or best-corrected visual acuity. All surgical procedures were uneventful. LASIK exhibited non-inferiority to non-LASIK for predictive refraction error and UNVA. An age/sex-matched regression analysis indicated no UDVA superiority between the two groups. Conclusions: Previous LASIK may have no discernible effect on the visual performance of presbyopia-correcting EDOF IOLs with respect to the absolute refractive error, UNVA, and UDVA. Longer follow-up and larger-scale studies are required to further validate these results.

Keywords: absolute prediction error; cataract; extended depth of focus; laser in situ keratomileusis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kim T.I., Del Barrio J.L.A., Wilkins M., Cochener B., Ang M. Refractive surgery. Lancet. 2019;393:2085–2098. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33209-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mai E.L., Chang C.-K., Lee C.-Y., Lian I.-B., Chao C.-C. Higher-order aberrations of topography-guided LASIK and wavefront-optimized LASIK in high- and low-myopic eyes: A non-randomized controlled trial. J. Pers. Med. 2023;13:399. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030399. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yeu E., Cuozzo S. Matching the patient to the intraocular lens: Preoperative considerations to optimize surgical outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:e132–e141. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abulafia A., Hill W.E., Koch D.D., Wang L., Barrett G.D. Accuracy of the Barrett True-K formula for intraocular lens power prediction after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2016;42:363–369. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Walker J. Non-inferiority statistics and equivalence studies. BJA Educ. 2019;19:267–271. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources