Resected gallbladder polyps: comparison of the 2022 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound and Joint European Societies Guidelines' diagnostic performance
- PMID: 40711552
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11826-4
Resected gallbladder polyps: comparison of the 2022 Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound and Joint European Societies Guidelines' diagnostic performance
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (SRU) and the 2022 Joint European Societies (JES) Guidelines regarding management at presentation of gallbladder polyps ≥ 7 mm.
Materials and methods: All patients with ≥ 7 mm polyps reported on ultrasound scans at a hepatobiliary centre with eventual cholecystectomy over 20 years were retrospectively included. Four blinded radiologists reviewed selected images/clips. Shape and wall-thickening were used to categorize polyps. Imaging and relevant clinical features were used to derive guideline management into binary categories of no follow-up/follow vs refer-to-surgeon. Histological neoplastic polyps were defined as a positive outcome. Reliability, sensitivity, and specificity for both guidelines were tabulated.
Results: One hundred thirty-five patients (mean age 51.9 years, 62 female [45.9%]) with a median polyp size of 12 mm (range 7-45) formed the study cohort. Twenty-eight out of one hundred thirty-five (20.7%) of patients had neoplastic polyps (1 low-grade dysplasia, 5 pyloric gland adenoma, 8 intracholecystic papillary neoplasm, 12 carcinoma in situ/carcinoma, 2 metastases). Pooled kappa values for SRUs and JES's polyp risk categorization were 0.70 (CI: 0.64-0.76) and 0.64 (CI: 0.57-0.71) for intra-observer and 0.41 (CI: 0.35-0.46) and 0.47 (CI: -0.40 to 0.53) for inter-observer agreement. SRU's low and indeterminate risk polyps had an odds ratio of 4.4 (p = 0.002) and 16.9 (p < 0.001) of being neoplastic compared to "very-low risk" polyps. Sensitivity, specificity and AUROC (CI) for SRU were 62% (43-80), 90% (85-95), 0.76 (0.66-0.86), and JES were 90% (79-100), 41% (32-49), 0.66 (0.58-0.73) respectively. The differences between the sensitivity and specificity of the two guidelines were significant (p = 0.002 and < 0.0001, respectively).
Conclusion: For ≥ 7 mm polyps, the SRU guidelines have significantly higher specificity with acceptable sensitivity, whereas the JES guidelines have significantly higher sensitivity with low specificity.
Key points: Question What are the diagnostic performances of the 2022 SRU and the JES guidelines for the management of ≥ 7 mm gallbladder polyps? Findings The SRU guidelines were significantly more specific but less sensitive than the JES guidelines. Clinical relevance For ≥ 7 mm polyps, the 2022 SRU guidelines would result in fewer surgical referrals and may be more applicable to the low-incidence populations of Europe and North America.
Keywords: Gallbladder neoplasms/diagnosis; Polyps; Practice guidelines as topic; Reproducibility of results; Ultrasonography.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Conflict of interest statement
Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Korosh Khalili. Conflict of interest: The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. Statistics and biometry: Chantelle Lin, MSc, and Pascal Tyrell, PhD, kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript. Informed consent: Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Ethical approval: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Study subjects or cohorts overlap: None. Methodology: Retrospective Diagnostic study Performed at one institution
References
-
- Lin WR, Lin DY, Tai DI et al (2008) Prevalence of and risk factors for gallbladder polyps detected by ultrasonography among healthy Chinese: analysis of 34 669 cases. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:965–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2007.05071.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kratzer W, Haenle MM, Voegtle A et al (2008) Ultrasonographically detected gallbladder polyps: a reason for concern? A seven-year follow-up study. BMC Gastroenterol 8:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-8-41 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Aldridge MC, Bismuth H (1990) Gallbladder cancer: the polyp-cancer sequence. Br J Surg 77:363–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800770403 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Albores-Saavedra J, Chable-Montero F, Gonzalez-Romo MA, Ramirez Jaramillo M, Henson DE (2012) Adenomas of the gallbladder. Morphologic features, expression of gastric and intestinal mucins, and incidence of high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma. Hum Pathol 43:1506–1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2011.11.011 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kozuka S, Tsubone N, Yasui A, Hachisuka K (1982) Relation of adenoma to carcinoma in the gallbladder. Cancer 50:2226–2234. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19821115)50:10<2226::aid-cncr282050... - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources