Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e093357.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093357.

Patient experiences with group consultations when treated with semaglutide for obesity: a qualitative case study in a Danish general practice

Rasmus Dahl-Larsen  1 , P R Jakobsen  2 , Jens Søndergaard  3 , Jan Erik Henriksen  4 , Elisabeth Assing Hvidt  5
Affiliations

Patient experiences with group consultations when treated with semaglutide for obesity: a qualitative case study in a Danish general practice

Rasmus Dahl-Larsen et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: In this case study conducted in a Danish general practice, we aimed to explore how patients with obesity experience a novel treatment approach: group consultations (GCs) for weight loss, lifestyle changes and semaglutide treatment. To receive semaglutide treatment, patients were required to participate in GCs focused on lifestyle changes.

Design: A qualitative study design comprising individual, semistructured interviews was used. Patients were asked to reflect on and describe their past experiences with participating in GCs. Thematic analysis was used as an analytical strategy.

Setting: A general practice located in a larger city in the Region of Southern Denmark.

Participants: 12 patients (eight women and four men) with obesity, aged between 27 years and 69 years, who met the Danish obesity treatment criteria for semaglutide (body mass index over 30 kg/m2 or over 27 kg/m2 with comorbidities), were included. Data were collected from 1 November 2023 to 31 January 2024.

Results: Before attending GCs, patients were worried about sharing personal information with other patients and losing their confidentiality. They also feared being judged by the others in the group, possibly due to previous experiences of stigmatisation. However, after participating in GCs, patients reported positive experiences with peer sharing, had no issues with confidentiality and found the consultations beneficial. Most patients indicated a preference for GCs over one-on-one consultations in the future.

Conclusions: Despite initial concerns about confidentiality and stigmatisation, patients ultimately had positive experiences and gained valuable peer support during group GCs in general practice. Various aspects of the group design, such as the hybrid consultation format and the role of the facilitator, may impact the effectiveness of peer support and influence patients' overall experience of GCs.

Keywords: GENERAL MEDICINE (see Internal Medicine); Health Education; Obesity; Peer Group; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; Telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RDL has participated in a podcast on obesity organised by Novo Nordisk; however, this activity is unrelated to the current study. JS serves on the board of the Research Fund for General Practice but has not been involved in the application for or allocation of funding for this project. RDL, JS and EAH are employed by the University of Southern Denmark (SDU), which administers the scholarship funding, but none of them have any influence over decisions regarding the awarding of scholarships. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The flow for when the patient had their medication adjusted and when to participate in the group consultation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Folkesundhed SIf Danskernes Sundhed - Tal fra Den Nationale Sundhedsprofil: Sundhedsstyrelsen. 2023. www.danskernessundhed.dk Available.
    1. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, et al. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. The Lancet. 2011;378:815–25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60814-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thompson D, Edelsberg J, Colditz GA, et al. Lifetime health and economic consequences of obesity. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2177–83. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.18.2177. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Specchia ML, Veneziano MA, Cadeddu C, et al. Economic impact of adult obesity on health systems: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health. 2015;25:255–62. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku170. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nagi MA, Ahmed H, Rezq MAA, et al. Economic costs of obesity: a systematic review. Int J Obes. 2024;48:33–43. doi: 10.1038/s41366-023-01398-y. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources