Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2025 Jul 25;18(7):e266357.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2025-266357.

Bilateral ectopic pregnancy in patient with HIV and modified algorithm

Affiliations
Case Reports

Bilateral ectopic pregnancy in patient with HIV and modified algorithm

Dominic Joseph Alexander Edwards et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

This case report describes a rare occurrence of spontaneous bilateral ectopic pregnancy (BEP) in a woman in her 30s, at approximately 7 weeks of gestation in Western Uganda. The patient presented with worsening lower abdominal pain, light vaginal bleeding and vomiting. Initial transvaginal ultrasound suggested a unilateral ectopic pregnancy; however, subsequent imaging and intraoperative findings confirmed bilateral ampullary ectopic pregnancies, one of which had ruptured. This woman had a recent diagnosis of HIV on antiretroviral therapy; she otherwise had no history of assisted reproductive technologies or other risk factors. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of BEP, emphasising the importance of thorough adnexal evaluation during imaging and intraoperative assessment. The report contributes to existing literature by discussing risk factors and management strategies while advocating for heightened clinical awareness, especially in resource-limited settings. A modified algorithm is attached to guide clinical decision-making regarding suspected BEP. .

Keywords: Ectopic pregnancy; Pregnancy; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Local medical centre transvaginal ultrasound image showing the right-sided adnexal mass.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Tertiary hospital transvaginal ultrasound image showing the left ruptured adnexal mass.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Operative specimens: (a) left ruptured ectopic tubal pregnancy and (b) right ectopic tubal pregnancy.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Modified algorithm for the management of suspected bilateral tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Similar articles

References

    1. Shenoy JV, Choudhary V, Giles RWH. Bilateral ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25:612–3. doi: 10.1080/01443610500242689. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang S, Liu J, Yang L, et al. Global burden and trends of ectopic pregnancy: An observational trend study from 1990 to 2019. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0291316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291316. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrews J, Farrell S, Andrews J. Spontaneous Bilateral Tubal Pregnancies: A Case Report. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30:51–4. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32713-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jena SK, Singh S, Nayak M, et al. Bilateral Simultaneous Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy: A Case Report, Review of Literature and a Proposed Management Algorithm. J Clin Diagn Res . 2016;10:QD01–3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16521.7416. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, et al. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.007. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types