Comparative study of sperm protamine gene expression and chromatin integrity in Nellore and Angus bulls
- PMID: 40714522
- DOI: 10.1016/j.repbio.2025.101051
Comparative study of sperm protamine gene expression and chromatin integrity in Nellore and Angus bulls
Abstract
Methodologies used to evaluate bull fertility often overlook sperm chromatin, a nuclear structure critical for reproductive success due to its DNA composition, which is tightly bound to nucleoproteins called protamines. In mammals, the ratio between Protamine 1 (PRM1) and Protamine 2 (PRM2) plays a pivotal role in male fertility, with imbalances linked to infertility in species such as humans and mice. While bull sperm chromatin was previously believed to contain only PRM1, recent findings have confirmed the presence of PRM2, prompting questions about the impact of the PRM1:PRM2 ratio on bull fertility. The present study hypothesizes that bull infertility may be associated with impaired protamination, resulting in imbalances between PRM1 and PRM2 gene expression. The objective was to compare the chromatin structure through protamine deficiency (CMA3), DNA susceptibility to fragmentation, and PRM1 and PRM2 gene expression among bulls of differing in vivo fertility levels (high fertility and low fertility) and breeds (Nellore and Angus). Sperm from 14 Nellore and 20 Angus bulls with high and low in vivo fertility were analyzed for protamine deficiency, susceptibility to DNA fragmentation, and PRM1 and PRM2 gene expression. Additionally, PRM1:PRM2 ratios were calculated for each experimental group. Results revealed solely a breed effect. Nellore sperm exhibited lower susceptibility to DNA fragmentation and higher PRM1 and PRM2 total transcripts compared to Angus. Conversely, Nellore sperm also demonstrated greater susceptibility to protamine deficiency. Protamine composition may not explain fertility differences, it could play a significant role in adaptive mechanisms across bull breeds.
Keywords: Angus; Chromatin; Fertility; Nellore; Protamination.
Copyright © 2025 Society for Biology of Reproduction & the Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research of Polish Academy of Sciences in Olsztyn. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Sperm protamine-status correlates to the fertility of breeding bulls.Biol Reprod. 2015 Apr;92(4):92. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.124255. Epub 2015 Feb 11. Biol Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25673563
-
Detection of protamine 2 in bovine spermatozoa and testicles.Andrology. 2019 May;7(3):373-381. doi: 10.1111/andr.12610. Epub 2019 Mar 28. Andrology. 2019. PMID: 30920782
-
Loss of Prm1 leads to defective chromatin protamination, impaired PRM2 processing, reduced sperm motility and subfertility in male mice.Development. 2022 Jun 15;149(12):dev200330. doi: 10.1242/dev.200330. Epub 2022 Jun 20. Development. 2022. PMID: 35608054 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of sperm protamine deficiency and sperm DNA damage on human male fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Andrology. 2016 Sep;4(5):789-99. doi: 10.1111/andr.12216. Epub 2016 May 27. Andrology. 2016. PMID: 27231200
-
Antioxidants for male subfertility.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(12):CD007411. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007411.pub3. Epub 2014 Dec 15. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 14;3:CD007411. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007411.pub4. PMID: 25504418 Updated.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources