Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;66(5):e70066.
doi: 10.1111/vru.70066.

Non-ECG Gated Computed Tomographic Left Atrium-to-Aortic Diameter Ratio is not a Sensitive Discriminator for Detecting Left Atrial Enlargement in Dogs

Affiliations

Non-ECG Gated Computed Tomographic Left Atrium-to-Aortic Diameter Ratio is not a Sensitive Discriminator for Detecting Left Atrial Enlargement in Dogs

Jake Johnson et al. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Echocardiography and radiography are frequently used to evaluate left atrial size, which serves as an important prognostic marker for canine cardiac conditions. However, there are no published criteria in veterinary medicine that allow for non-ECG gated CT to detect the presence or absence of left atrial enlargement (LAE). The availability of a validated measurement of left atrial size would have the potential to improve the detection of cardiac disease in dogs having thoracic exams for non-cardiovascular reasons. The objective of this study was to evaluate a non-ECG gated CT left atrium-to-aortic diameter ratio (LA:Ao) for detecting LAE, while using a two-dimensional (2D) echocardiogram as the gold standard. One hundred twenty-three dogs that underwent thoracic non-ECG gated CT and echocardiogram within 1 month of one another were evaluated retrospectively. Thirty-three dogs were diagnosed with LAE on 2D echocardiogram (short axis LA:Ao ≥ 1.6) while 90 dogs had a normal left atrial size. The CT LA:Ao was not a sensitive discriminator for LAE in dogs; however, larger ratios were highly specific. Dogs with a CT LA:Ao ≥ 3.4 (97% specificity, 15% sensitivity, 71% PPV, and 76% NPV) may benefit from further evaluation with an echocardiogram at the discretion of the clinical care team. Overall, the method evaluated in this study was not able to reliably detect dogs that have echocardiographically confirmed LAE and, as such, appears to have low clinical utility. The use of multiplanar reconstructed images to emulate the right parasternal short-axis plane is recommended for future studies.

Keywords: CT; canine; cardiomegaly; echocardiography; mitral valve disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. K. Jepsen‐Grant, R. E. Pollard, and L. R. Johnson, “Vertebral Heart Scores in Eight Dog Breeds,” Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound: The Official Journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association 54 (2012): 3–8.
    1. H. G. Parker and P. Kilroy‐Glynn, “Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease in Dogs: Does Size Matter?,” J Vet Cardiol 14, no. 1 (2012): 19–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvc.2012.01.006.
    1. P. R. Fox, “Pathology of Myxomatous Mitral Valve Disease in the Dog,” Journal of Veterinary Cardiology 14, no. 1 (2012): 103–126.
    1. D. J. Brown, J. E. Rush, J. MacGregor, et al., “M‐mode Echocardiographic Ratio Indices in Normal Dogs, Cats, and Horses: A Novel Quantitative Method,” JVIM 17 (2003): 653–662.
    1. K. Hansson, J. Häggström, C. Kvart, et al., “Left Atrial to Aortic Root Indices Using Two Dimensional and M‐mode Echocardiography in Cavalier King Charles Spaniels With and Without Left Atrial Enlargement,” Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound: The Official Journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association 43 (2002): 568–575.