A meta-analysis of retinal vascular density in different severities of myopia assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography
- PMID: 40716076
- DOI: 10.1111/opo.13554
A meta-analysis of retinal vascular density in different severities of myopia assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of myopia severity (mild, moderate or high) on retinal vascular density (VD) and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).
Methods: Studies were included based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria required studies reporting mean VD or FAZ for three severities of myopia. The quality assessment followed the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Data were pooled using fixed- or random-effects models depending on heterogeneity. The research protocol was published in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with registration number CRD42025638165.
Results: Twelve studies (2302 eyes) met the inclusion criteria. VD was assessed in both macular (foveal, parafoveal and perifoveal) and peripapillary regions, depending on the included study, and showed a decrease in the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) with increasing myopia severity, while the FAZ size remained relatively stable across groups. High myopia was associated with lower VD, particularly in the foveal and parafoveal regions in both the SCP and deep capillary plexus (DCP). VD in the foveal SCP was higher in mild (24.13%) compared to high myopia (20.59%). Similarly, parafoveal VD in the SCP was 52.53% and 49.66% in mild and high myopia, respectively. FAZ size remained relatively stable across groups, ranging from 0.30 to 0.32 mm2.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that high myopia is associated with a lower VD, particularly in SCP, with no consistent enlargement of the FAZ. The findings highlight the progressive impact of myopia severity on retinal microvasculature.
Keywords: foveal avascular zone; macular microvasculature; myopia; optical coherence tomography angiography; vessel density.
© 2025 College of Optometrists.
Similar articles
-
Longitudinal Changes in Macular Vessel Density in High Myopia on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.Ophthalmic Res. 2025;68(1):342-351. doi: 10.1159/000543975. Epub 2025 May 19. Ophthalmic Res. 2025. PMID: 40388900
-
Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Angiographic Study in Children with a History of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Curr Eye Res. 2025 Feb;50(2):111-123. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2024.2397034. Epub 2024 Aug 29. Curr Eye Res. 2025. PMID: 39210511
-
Optical coherence tomography angiography measurements in patients with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06860-3. Online ahead of print. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 40555838 Review.
-
Optical coherence tomography angiography measurements in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 Nov;91:105864. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105864. Epub 2024 Sep 2. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024. PMID: 39265270
-
The central retina vessel density and foveal avascular zone values of 792 healthy adults using optical coherence tomography angiography.Eye (Lond). 2024 Dec;38(18):3434-3442. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03320-w. Epub 2024 Sep 18. Eye (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39289520
References
REFERENCES
-
- Baird PN, Saw S‐M, Lanca C, Guggenheim JA, Smith Iii EL, Zhou X, et al. Myopia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6:99. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572‐020‐00231‐4
-
- Avetisov ES, Savitskaya NF. Some features of ocular microcirculation in myopia. Ann Ophthalmol. 1977;9:1261–1264.
-
- Hu R, Wu Q, Yi Z, Chen C. Multimodal imaging of optic nerve head abnormalities in high myopia. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1366593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1366593
-
- Hayreh SS. The blood supply of the optic nerve head and the evaluation of it—myth and reality. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001;20:563–593.
-
- Tano Y. Pathologic myopia: where are we now? Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;134:645–660.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous