Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Aug;21(19):2537-2547.
doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2529094. Epub 2025 Jul 28.

Molecular testing, treatment patterns, and outcomes in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: the PISCES study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Molecular testing, treatment patterns, and outcomes in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: the PISCES study

Panwen Tian et al. Future Oncol. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: This study investigated molecular testing, treatment patterns, and prognosis in Chinese patients who progressed from first-line (1 L), epidermal growth factor receptor -tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) therapy, highlighting limited real-world data on clinical practice.

Methods: Consecutive eligible patients were prospectively enrolled in 16-centers in China. The primary endpoints were second-line (2 L) treatment patterns and clinical outcomes, including median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) from 2 L treatment.

Results: Overall, 300 patients were enrolled in the study, and among them, 291 patients were included in the Full Analysis Set, and 213(73.2%) underwent molecular testing, after progression from 1 L therapy. 30.5% (65/213) had tissue samples, while 66.7% (142/213) had plasma samples. In tissue and plasma samples, T790M positive rates were 53.8% and 43.7%, respectively. mPFS and mOS for patients with T790M positive who received third generation (3 G) EGFR-TKIs as 2 L therapy were 14.7 months and 32.0 months, respectively. The mPFS for patients with T790M negative who received 3 G EGFR-TKIs, prior EGFR-TKIs plus local therapy, and chemotherapy as 2 L therapy were 7.6 months, 10.2 months, and 4.9 months, respectively. The corresponding mOS for these patients were 21.2 months, 16.6 months, and 15.0 months, respectively. No new safety signal emerged.

Conclusions: Patients with acquired resistance to first generation (1 G)/second generation (2 G) EGFR-TKIs receiving 3 G EGFR-TKIs, especially T790M positive, showed better clinical outcomes after molecular testing.

Clinical trial registration: The study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04207775).

Keywords: EGFR-TKIs resistance; NSCLC; molecular testing; real-world; treatment patterns.

Plain language summary

This study looked at how Chinese patients with lung cancer were treated after their cancer stopped responding to first-line (1 L) epidermal growth factor receptor -tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), a type of targeted therapy. Researchers focused on what second-line (2 L) treatments patients received, how long the treatments worked, and how long the patients lived afterward. The study involved 300 patients from 16 hospitals across China. Out of 291 patients analyzed, 213 (73.2%) had molecular testing to look for specific genetic changes after their first treatment stopped working. The T790M mutation, which can influence treatment decisions, was found in 53.8% of tissue samples and 43.7% of blood (plasma) samples. Patients with the T790M mutation who received third generation (3 G) EGFR-TKIs had the best outcomes, living a median of 14.7 months without disease progression and 32.0 months overall. Those without the mutation had shorter survival, depending on the 2 L treatment used. For example, those who received chemotherapy had the shortest survival. Overall, the study shows that molecular testing after 1 L treatment is very important. Patients who tested positive for the T790M mutation and were treated with 3 G EGFR-TKIs had significantly better outcomes, and no new safety issues were found during the study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data