Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar;24(1):66-71.
doi: 10.5114/pm.2025.150082. Epub 2025 May 3.

Minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy - the current European landscape

Affiliations
Review

Minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy - the current European landscape

Piotr Pluta et al. Prz Menopauzalny. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy (M-NSM), performed with endoscopic systems or with surgical robot assistance, is a novel alternative to the classic approach to nipple-sparing mastectomies. Leading advancements in M-NSM have primarily come from Asia. We gather experts' opinions from six European countries to establish the current status of M-NSM in Europe. An eight-question survey was designed to explore M-NSM's historical background and current standing in various local settings. We collected data from 6 European countries, including Italy, Spain, France, Switzerland, Belgium, and Poland. The number of centers offering M-NSM procedures in each reported country ranges 1-9. The number of procedures performed annually in four centers exceeds 10. In all reported countries, current national breast cancer recommendations do not include M-NSM, and this procedure is not explicitly covered by any of the national health care providers. All experts have indicated the need for training in M-NSM surgery as a primary way to incorporate these techniques as a standard procedure. Minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy is still a tool used by a narrow group of specialists in Europe. The main obstacle to broader implementation remains the extra cost of M-NSM, which requires reimbursement from the health care providers. Training courses, data collection, and demonstration of its benefits are the key to promoting M-NSM among breast surgeons and patients.

Keywords: endoscopic mastectomy; endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy; minimal access nipple-sparing mastectomy; robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy; robotic mastectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, Blankenship SA, Hecht EM. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22: 3241-3249. - PubMed
    1. Galimberti V, Vicini E, Corso G, et al. Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications. Breast 2017; 34: S82-S84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gunnarsson GL, Salzberg CA. Current status of pre-and retropectoral breast reconstructions worldwide: a narrative review. Gland Surg 2024; 13: 1305-1314. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang ZH, Gao GX, Liu WH, et al. Single-port nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction for breast cancer. Surg Endosc 2023; 37: 3842-3851. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu X, Gao X, Pan C, et al. Postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy with prosthesis breast reconstruction in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Robot Surg 2024; 18: 274. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources