Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 24;11(8):e1838.
doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001838. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Optimal Utilization of Donors Aged ≥65 Y in Lung Transplantation to Increase Donor Availability While Maintaining Comparable Posttransplant Outcomes

Affiliations

Optimal Utilization of Donors Aged ≥65 Y in Lung Transplantation to Increase Donor Availability While Maintaining Comparable Posttransplant Outcomes

Marniker A Wijesinha et al. Transplant Direct. .

Abstract

Background: Utilizing older donors (≥65 y) in lung transplantation can greatly expand donor availability while potentially maintaining typical survival outcomes in certain subpopulations, such as older recipients, especially compared to survival with single lung transplants (which comprise ~20%-25% of US lung transplants according to recent data).

Methods: This study included US adult lung transplants from 2010 to 2021 in the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients. To compare patient groups defined by donor age (D < 65 or D ≥ 65) and transplant type (single or double), stratified by recipient age (R18-39, R40-64, R ≥ 65), Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to generate Kaplan-Meier survival estimates adjusted for >15 available covariates.

Results: In R40-64, survival with D ≥ 65 double (adjusted median survival [aMS] = 7.1 [3.3-12.0] y, n = 150, P = 0.15) at least equaled survival with D < 65 single (aMS = 5.7 [2.5-10.2] y, n = 2926), whereas D ≥ 65 single use was uncommon (n = 23), and survival was highest with D < 65 double (aMS = 7.7 [3.0-13.4] y, n = 10 934, P < 0.01). In R ≥ 65, survival with D ≥ 65 double (aMS = 5.0 [2.2-10.8] y, n = 90, P = 0.53) or D ≥ 65 single (aMS = 5.3 [1.9-8.4] y, n = 73, P = 0.72) was not significantly different from survival with D < 65 single (aMS = 4.7 [2.1-8.1] y, n = 3913), whereas survival was highest with D < 65 double (aMS = 5.8 [2.0-10.2] y, n = 4209, P < 0.01). In R18-39, D ≥ 65 were uncommon (n = 15).

Conclusions: Among lung recipients aged 40-64 y, donor age ≥65 y double transplants yield survival at least matching that of donor age <65 y single transplants. Among recipients aged ≥65 y, donor age ≥65 y double or single transplants yield survival comparable to that of donor age <65 single transplants. Compared with donor age <65 y double transplants, donor age ≥65 y double transplants had only ≤10 mo shorter adjusted median survival, within recipients aged ≥40 y. Judiciously increasing utilization of donors aged ≥65 y within recipients aged ≥40 y can reduce deaths among patients needing a lung transplant by decreasing donor scarcity, while maintaining favorable posttransplant survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Frequencies of single lung transplants vs donor age ≥65 lung transplants, per year from 2010 to 2021.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Adjusted Kaplan–Meier survival curves, by donor age and transplant type group (generated via inverse probability of treatment weighting based on covariates). A, Recipients aged 40–64 y. Note: The D ≥ 65 single transplant group, in Recipients 40–64, had insufficient data (n = 23) for reliable survival estimates. B, Recipients aged ≥65 y.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Adjusted survival probabilities at 1 and 5 y posttransplant, for 10-y donor age groups (generated via inverse probability of treatment weighting based on covariates). A, One-year survival. B, Five-year survival.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Plot of estimated FEV1 % predicted slopes from year 1 to 5 (based on yearly follow-up data, adjusted for baseline covariates), by donor age and transplant type.

References

    1. Valapour M, Lehr CJ, Schladt DP, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2021 annual data report: lung. Am J Transplant. 2023;23(2 Suppl 1):S379–S442. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu JQ, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, Arias E. Deaths: Final data for 2019. National Vital Statistics Reports. Vol 70. National Center for Health Statistics. 2021.
    1. Pradere P, Le Pavec J, Morisset S, et al. Donor to recipient age matching in lung transplantation: a European experience. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024;43:1716–1726. - PubMed
    1. Valapour M, Lehr CJ, Schladt DP, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2022 annual data report: lung. Am J Transplant. 2024;24:S394–S456. - PubMed
    1. Bittle GJ, Sanchez PG, Kon ZN, et al. The use of lung donors older than 55 years: a review of the United Network of Organ Sharing database. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:760–768. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources