Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun 24;17(6):e86701.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.86701. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Methylene Blue in Septic Shock: Emerging Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions

Affiliations
Review

Methylene Blue in Septic Shock: Emerging Evidence, Clinical Applications, and Future Directions

Namrata Maheshwari et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Septic shock remains a significant cause of mortality in intensive care units worldwide despite advances in management strategies. The pathophysiology involves profound circulatory and cellular abnormalities leading to vasoplegic shock. While norepinephrine remains the first-line vasopressor, there is growing interest in catecholamine-sparing agents to mitigate the adverse effects of adrenergic overstimulation. Methylene blue, with its inhibitory action on nitric oxide pathways, has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy. This review examines the theoretical mechanisms, pharmacokinetics, clinical evidence, and practical considerations for methylene blue use in septic shock. While some promising results regarding reduced vasopressor requirements and length of stay are suggested, current evidence does not support methylene blue as a replacement for established second-line agents like vasopressin. Further large-scale randomized trials are needed to establish optimal dosing regimens, timing of administration, and specific patient populations who might benefit most from this intervention.

Keywords: catecholamine-sparing therapy; cyclic gmp pathway; methylene blue; nitric oxide inhibition; refractory septic shock; vasopressin comparison; vasopressor requirements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Similar articles

References

    1. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. JAMA. 2016;315:801–810. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Lancet. 2020;395:200–211. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Crit Care Med. 2021;49:0–143. - PubMed
    1. Severe sepsis and septic shock. Angus DC, van der Poll T. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:840–851. - PubMed
    1. Current use of vasopressors in septic shock. Scheeren TW, Bakker J, De Backer D, et al. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9:20. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources