Clinician and patient perceptions around implementing remote blood pressure monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A survey-based study
- PMID: 40718404
- PMCID: PMC12290385
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076251317567
Clinician and patient perceptions around implementing remote blood pressure monitoring for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A survey-based study
Abstract
Objective: Remote blood pressure monitoring (RBPM) is a promising method for surveilling hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). This refers to an organised framework in which clinicians can review and manage patient-obtained blood pressure recordings. Successful integration of RBPM into routine antenatal care necessitates understanding patient and clinician perspectives of its use. This study sought to evaluate the perceptions of high-risk pregnant women and clinicians regarding RBPM's use in HDP surveillance.
Methods: A web-based questionnaire was distributed to pregnant women in South Western Sydney and clinicians across Australia and New Zealand. Quantitative Likert scales and qualitative open-ended questions were used to ascertain perceptions about RBPM for the surveillance of HDP.
Results: Seventy-six women responded to the patient survey, with a response rate of 74.5%. A total of 65 clinicians responded to the healthcare professional survey. Almost all women (97.4%) supported RBPM's potential to aid healthcare decisions, with 96.1% willing to incorporate RBPM into antenatal care. Linear regression revealed implementation of RBPM was particularly supported by women who had less time off from paid employment during their pregnancy (p < 0.001). Conversely, women from non-English-speaking backgrounds and lower-income groups perceived RBPM as more challenging to use (p = 0.011 and p = 0.017, respectively). Most clinicians were concerned about the security of data transfer and storage interfaces. Poor accuracy or reliability of the technology emerged as a common barrier amongst both women and clinicians. Free-text responses revealed novel themes including accountability of care and medicolegal ramifications.
Conclusion: Though socioeconomic status, ethnicity and language influenced perceptions towards RBPM; overall, Australian pregnant women and clinicians are broadly receptive to its use in antenatal care. Successful implementation of RPBM requires careful evaluation of design and workflow to accommodate for patient diversity, ease of use, compliance, privacy and clinical utility to optimise the user experience.
Keywords: Antenatal; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; pregnant women; questionnaire; remote blood pressure monitoring; survey.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training.2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Mar 29. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 36508513 Free Books & Documents.
-
Remote blood pressure monitoring in women at risk of or with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Apr;169(1):89-104. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16059. Epub 2024 Nov 29. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39611763
-
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016. PMID: 27532314
-
Lifetime history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is associated with shorter sleep duration and more sleep disturbance in midlife: results from the Project Viva women's health cohort.Biol Sex Differ. 2025 Jul 1;16(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13293-025-00725-4. Biol Sex Differ. 2025. PMID: 40597286 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26212714 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Excellence NIfHaC. Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management NICE guideline [NG133]. 2019.
-
- Shanmugalingam R, Wang X, Motum P, et al. Clinical influence of nonadherence with prophylactic aspirin in preventing preeclampsia in high-risk pregnancies: a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study. Hypertension 2020; 75: 1125–1132. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources