Systematic Review and Expert Consensus on the Use of Long-acting Monoclonal Antibodies for Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease: ARMADA (Advancing RSV Management And Disease Awareness) Taskforce
- PMID: 40718547
- PMCID: PMC12290402
- DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf396
Systematic Review and Expert Consensus on the Use of Long-acting Monoclonal Antibodies for Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease: ARMADA (Advancing RSV Management And Disease Awareness) Taskforce
Abstract
Background: Long-acting monoclonal antibodies (LAmAbs) could dramatically reduce the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) disease burden in children if implemented using clear, evidence-based recommendations.
Methods: The ARMADA Taskforce-an international, multidisciplinary expert panel-undertook a systematic review to develop LAmAbs consensus recommendations for RSV disease prevention in children.
Results: The Taskforce recommends LAmAbs for all infants aged <8 months in the absence of maternal RSV vaccination, preterm infants (<37 weeks' gestational age) aged <12 months, and children <24 months with high-risk conditions. Seasonal LAmAb administration is recommended, although in RSV-endemic countries decisions should be made locally concerning administration year-round or with peak RSV incidences.
Conclusions: The Taskforce strongly endorses LAmAbs implementation based on their efficacy, effectiveness, and public health impact. These recommendations provide a blueprint to inform guidelines worldwide. Wider equitable access to LAmAbs at affordable prices, especially in low- and middle-income countries is needed to reduce the childhood RSV burden.
Keywords: disease prevention; long-acting monoclonal antibodies (LAmAbs); public health impact; respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential conflicts of interest. P.M. has received research funding and/or compensation as advisor/lecturer from AstraZeneca, Moderna, GSK, Pfizer, and Sanofi and is a member of ReSViNET. E.B. has received fees for lectures and advisory boards from Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi. T.H. has received fees for lectures and/or participation in advisory boards or data monitoring committees from Sanofi, MSD, Pfizer, and Moderna, and he is a member of ReSViNET. R.T. has completed consultancy work for AstraZeneca. A.G.E.N. has received honoraria for participating in advisory boards from Sanofi and AstraZeneca. M.C. has been an advisory board member for AstraZeneca. M.A.P.S. has received honoraria for lectures and/or participation in advisory boards or data monitoring committees from Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Pfizer, and GSK. H.J.Z. has received funding for studies on RSV prevention studies to institution in infants from Pfizer, Novavax, AstraZeneca, MSD; DSMB of Moderna; Advisory board MSD, and Pfizer. B.R.G./N.W.'s employer has previously received payment for work on various projects from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi. X.C.E. has received consultancy fees from Pfizer. B.P. has received consultancy and speaker fees from AstraZeneca and Sanofi. M.S..L has received consultancy fees, and paid lectures from AstraZeneca and Sanofi, and paid lectures from Pfizer. The remaining authors have nothing to declare.
Figures
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
