Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 27;12(3):e70387.
doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70387. eCollection 2025 Jul.

New algorithm for management of multiligament knee injuries: A tertiary level trauma center experience

Ayman AbdelKawi  1 , Mohammed Fargaly  1 , Gaber Eid  2 , Maher El Assal  1 , Hesham Elkady  1 , Tarek N Fetih  1
Affiliations

New algorithm for management of multiligament knee injuries: A tertiary level trauma center experience

Ayman AbdelKawi et al. J Exp Orthop. .

Abstract

Purpose: Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) are severe orthopedic traumas frequently associated with concomitant structural damage, often leading to significant long-term morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the rate of return to work (RTW) following the management of MLKIs using a standardized treatment algorithm.

Methods: This prospective interventional study included patients with MLKIs who presented to a tertiary trauma center between 2019 and 2022. A total of 32 patients (30 males and 2 females) were enrolled and classified according to the Schenck classification system. The median age at the time of injury was 31 years (range: 17-60 years). The mechanism of injury was high-energy trauma in 21 patients, sports-related trauma in eight patients, and low-energy trauma in three patients. Clinical outcomes were assessed at final follow-up using the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, and return to work status.

Results: At a mean 2-year postoperative follow-up, the average range of motion across all patients was 134.2° ± 16.6°. The mean postoperative Lysholm, IKDC, and UCLA scores were 86.4 ± 12.6, 65.9 ± 9.7, and 6.9 ± 2.2, respectively. Notably, 90.6% of the patients achieved a successful return to their previous work. The proportion of patients returning to work was significantly higher in the Knee Dislocation Injury (KDI) group compared to the other three Schenck classification groups, which showed no significant difference among themselves. Radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (OA) was observed in four cases (12.5%).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that satisfactory to excellent short-term clinical outcomes, including a high rate of return to work, can be achieved following ligament reconstruction for multiligament knee injuries when utilizing a standardized treatment algorithm. However, the potential for long-term complications, such as the development of knee osteoarthritis, warrants careful consideration and continued monitoring.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

Keywords: Schenck's classification; clinical outcomes; knee dislocation; multiligament knee injury; return to work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Protocol for management of acute multiligament knee injuries (MLKI). KD, knee dislocation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Protocol for management of chronic MLKI. CPM, continuous passive motion; MLKI, multiligament knee injuries; ROM, range of motion; TKA, total knee arthroplasty.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graft selection in the chronic cases according to Schenck classification. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; G, gracillis; H, hamstrings; KD, knee dislocation; MCL, medial collateral ligament; PL, peroneus longus tendon; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament; PLC, posterolateral complex; Q, quadriceps tendon; semiT, semitendinosis tendon. *SBT, split biceps transfer done if the head of fibula was very porotic, very small or had an old healed fracture.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Preoperative x‐ray AP view of the dislocated knee. (b & c) Postoperative x‐ray AP and Lateral views of knee after reduction with cross knee external fixator. (d–g) Preoperative fat‐suppressed coronal and sagittal MRI images showing PCL, ACL, PLC and MCL injury. (h & i) Two years postoperative follow up x‐ray AP and lateral views of the knee showing PCL, ACL and PLC reconstruction. (j–m): Two years postoperative follow‐up MRI knee showing PCL, ACL, MCL and PLC reconstruction. (n & o): Two years postoperative clinical photo of the knee range of motion. ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; MCL, medial collateral ligament; PCL, posterior cruciate ligament; PLC, posterolateral corner
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Angelini FJ, Helito CP, Bonadio MB, da Mota E Albuquerque RF, Pecora JR, Camanho GL. Surgical management of knee dislocations with ligament reconstruction associated with a hinged external fixator. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(1):77–81. - PubMed
    1. D'Ambrosi R, Meena A, Ursino N, Di Feo F, Fusari N, Kambhampati SBS. Return to sport after multiligament knee injury: a systematic review of the literature. Indian J Orthop. 2024;58:1548–1556. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dedmond BT, Almekinders LC. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of knee dislocations: a meta‐analysis. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14(1):33–38. - PubMed
    1. Edwards GAD, Sarasin SM, Davies AP. Dislocation of the knee: an epidemic in waiting? J Emerg Med. 2013;44(1):68–71. - PubMed
    1. Everhart JS, Du A, Chalasani R, Kirven JC, Magnussen RA, Flanigan DC. Return to work or sport after multiligament knee injury: a systematic review of 21 studies and 524 patients. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(5):1708–1716. - PubMed