Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Aug;32(8):e70312.
doi: 10.1111/ene.70312.

Unreactive EEG Background Is Associated With Unfavorable Outcome in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness of Various Etiologies: An Adult Cohort Study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Unreactive EEG Background Is Associated With Unfavorable Outcome in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness of Various Etiologies: An Adult Cohort Study

Sarah Benghanem et al. Eur J Neurol. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Prognostication of neurological outcome in critically ill patients presents significant challenges. While EEG reactivity may be associated with outcome in hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI), it has received scarce attention in other etiological conditions. Our objective was to investigate the association of EEG reactivity to clinical outcome in patients with disorders of consciousness of various etiologies.

Method: This is an ancillary study of the randomized CERTA trial (NCT03129438), which included adults with disorders of consciousness randomized to continuous EEG for 30-48 h or two routine EEGs (20-30 min). We explored the association between EEG characteristics and neurological outcome at 6 months, a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6 being considered unfavorable.

Results: A total of 364 patients were included. Among them, 112 patients had HIBI, 85 intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), 28 ischemic stroke, 48 traumatic brain injury (TBI), 23 toxic-metabolic encephalopathy, 7 encephalitis, and 114 had unknown or other etiologies. In the overall cohort, abnormal background continuity (OR 2.33, 95% CI [1.15-4.76], p = 0.019), ictal-interictal continuum features (OR 2.78, 95% CI [1.16-6.67], p = 0.021) and unreactive background (OR 10.9, 95% CI [1.97-58.82], p = 0.006) were independently associated with unfavorable outcome. In the overall cohort, unreactive EEG had specificity of 97.3% (95% CI [94.3-100]) and sensitivity of 22.1% (95% CI [17-27.2]) for unfavorable outcome. In HIBI, specificity was 97% (95% CI [91.1-100]) and sensitivity 46.8% (95% CI [35.8-57.8]); in ICH, specificity was 94.1% (95% CI [83-100]) and sensitivity 8.8% (95% CI [2.05-15.55]); in TBI, specificity was 94.1% (95% CI [83-100]) and sensitivity 22.6% (95% CI [7.8-37.3]).

Conclusion: In this etiologically mixed cohort of critically ill adults, unreactive EEG predicted unfavorable outcome at 6 months with high specificity. EEG reactivity may reduce prognostic uncertainty not only for patients with HIBI, but also for other types of acute brain injury, such as TBI and ICH.

Keywords: EEG reactivity; cardiac arrest; intracranial hemorrhage; neuroprognostication; traumatic brain injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Prognostic value of unreactive EEG for poor outcome prediction, according to etiology of acute brain injury. The bar plots indicate the value of specificity and sensitivity, and the black line represents the 95% confidence intervals. HIBI, Hypoxic–ischemic brain injury; ICH, Intra cranial hemorrhage; TBI, Traumatic brain injury.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lemiale V., Dumas F., Mongardon N., et al., “Intensive Care Unit Mortality After Cardiac Arrest: The Relative Contribution of Shock and Brain Injury in a Large Cohort,” Intensive Care Medicine 39 (2013): 1972–1980, 10.1007/s00134-013-3043-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sonneville R., Mazighi M., Collet M., et al., “One‐Year Outcomes in Patients With Acute Stroke Requiring Mechanical Ventilation,” Stroke 54 (2023): 2328–2337, 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.042910. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gao G., Wu X., Feng J., et al., “Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury in China: A Prospective, Multicentre, Longitudinal, Observational Study,” Lancet Neurology 19 (2020): 670–677, 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30182-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nolan J. P., Sandroni C., Böttiger B. W., et al., “European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines 2021: Post‐Resuscitation Care,” Intensive Care Medicine 47 (2021): 369–421, 10.1007/s00134-021-06368-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muehlschlegel S., Rajajee V., Wartenberg K. E., et al., “Guidelines for Neuroprognostication in Critically Ill Adults With Moderate‐Severe Traumatic Brain Injury,” Neurocritical Care 40 (2024): 448–476, 10.1007/s12028-023-01902-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types