Spatial location and hyperacuity: the centre/surround localization contribution function has two substrates
- PMID: 4072006
- DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90041-0
Spatial location and hyperacuity: the centre/surround localization contribution function has two substrates
Abstract
Vernier acuity and jump detection were investigated using a perturbation technique, in which a flanking line is placed to one side of the target line. The size and direction of vernier displacement, or jump, required for no apparent change of location is strongly influenced by the separation between the flanking line and the test line and by its polarity. For flanks within a zone extending approximately 3'-4' to either side of the target line, the target's location is assigned to a weighted centroid of the complete luminance distribution: The target is pulled towards the flank, when the flank has a positive contrast polarity, and repelled when the polarity is negative. The effects of a dark flank on one side and a bright flank on the other are additive. Outside this central zone repulsion effects are obtained independent of the contrast polarity of the flank and flanks on opposite sides of the target line can cancel each other's influence. Varying the duration of the flank produces maximal effects in the surround with shorter duration than that required for maximal effects in the centre. Thus, while the localization contribution function resembles the popular difference of gaussians receptive field profile, it has two components reflecting differing mechanisms. In the centre the earlier centroid hypothesis can be applied with the addition of distance dependent weights. The surround has characteristics resembling the feature interaction seen in figural after-effects.
Similar articles
-
Spatial location and hyperacuity: flank position within the centre and surround zones.Spat Vis. 1985;1(1):3-11. doi: 10.1163/156856885x00026. Spat Vis. 1985. PMID: 3940046
-
The effect of nearby luminance contrast polarity on color boundary localization.Vision Res. 1995 Oct;35(19):2767-71. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00014-q. Vision Res. 1995. PMID: 7483317
-
Binocular capture: the effects of spatial frequency and contrast polarity of the monocular target.Vision Res. 2011 Dec 8;51(23-24):2369-77. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Sep 28. Vision Res. 2011. PMID: 21982870
-
Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity.Vision Res. 1986;26(3):453-69. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90188-4. Vision Res. 1986. PMID: 3523972 Review.
-
Cortical mechanisms of normal and abnormal processing in the visual system, Part 1. Spatial vision, amblyopia, hyperacuity, modal assumptions: a review.Technol Health Care. 2009;17(2):77-97. doi: 10.3233/THC-2009-0531. Technol Health Care. 2009. PMID: 19564674 Review.
Cited by
-
Affective stimulus properties influence size perception and the Ebbinghaus illusion.Psychol Res. 2008 May;72(3):304-10. doi: 10.1007/s00426-007-0114-6. Epub 2007 Apr 5. Psychol Res. 2008. PMID: 17410379 Free PMC article.
-
Feature integration across space, time, and orientation.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1670-86. doi: 10.1037/a0015798. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009. PMID: 19968428 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial integration and cortical dynamics.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 23;93(2):615-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.2.615. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996. PMID: 8570604 Free PMC article.
-
The induced motion effect is a high-level visual phenomenon: Psychophysical evidence.Iperception. 2022 Sep 7;13(5):20416695221118111. doi: 10.1177/20416695221118111. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct. Iperception. 2022. PMID: 36092511 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of shape uses local apparent position rather than physical position.J Vis. 2021 Sep 1;21(10):5. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.10.5. J Vis. 2021. PMID: 34473200 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources