Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug;15(4):e70029.
doi: 10.1002/cph4.70029.

The Impact of Exercise Capacity on Complex Neuromuscular Adaptations: A Narrative Review Based on a Rat Model System Selectively Bred for Low and High Response to Training

Affiliations
Review

The Impact of Exercise Capacity on Complex Neuromuscular Adaptations: A Narrative Review Based on a Rat Model System Selectively Bred for Low and High Response to Training

Vinicius Guzzoni et al. Compr Physiol. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

There is scientific evidence that supports the association between aerobic exercise capacity and the risk of developing complex metabolic diseases. The factors that determine aerobic capacity can be categorized into two groups: intrinsic and extrinsic components. While exercise capacity is influenced by both the intrinsic fitness levels of an organism and the extrinsic factors that emerge during training, physiological adaptations to exercise training can differ significantly among individuals. The interplay between intrinsic and acquired exercise capacities represents an obstacle to recognizing the exact mechanisms connecting aerobic exercise capacity and human health. Despite robust clinical associations between disease and a sedentary state or condition, the precise causative links between aerobic exercise capacity and disease susceptibility are yet to be fully uncovered. To provide clues into the intricacies of poor aerobic metabolism in an exercise-resistant phenotype, over two decades ago a novel rat model system was developed through two-way artificial selection and raised the question of whether large genetic differences in training responsiveness would bring about aberrant systemic disorders and closely regulate the risk factors in health and diseases. Genetically heterogeneous outbred (N/NIH) rats were used as a founder population to develop contrasting animal models of high versus low intrinsic running capacity (HCR vs. LCR) and high versus low responsiveness to endurance training (HRT vs. LRT). The underlying hypothesis was that variation in capacity for energy transfer is the central mechanistic determinant of the divide between complex disease and health. The use of the outbred, genetically heterogeneous rat models for exercise capacity aims to capture the genetic complexity of complex diseases and mimic the diversity of exercise traits among humans. Accumulating evidence indicates that epigenetic markers may facilitate the transmission of effects from exercise and diet to subsequent generations, implying that both exercise and diet have transgenerational effects on health and fitness. The process of selective breeding based on the acquired change in maximal running distance achieved during a treadmill-running tests before and after 8 weeks of training generated rat models of high response to training (HRT) and low response to training (LRT). In an untrained state, both LRT and HRT rats exhibit comparable levels of exercise capacity and show no major differences in cardiorespiratory fitness (maximal oxygen consumption, VO2max). However, after training, the HRT rats demonstrate significant improvements in running distance, VO2max, as well as other classic markers of cardiorespiratory fitness. The LRT rats, on the other hand, show no gain in running distance or VO2max upon completing the same training regime. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of studies using LRT and HRT models with a focus on differences in neuromuscular adaptations. This review also summarizes the involved molecular and cellular signaling pathways underlying skeletal muscle adaptations in LRT models in comparison to the HRT model, which responds positively to endurance training. The LRT-related adverse effects in neuromuscular responses seem to be primarily driven by: (i) impaired glucose tolerance or impaired insulin sensitivity, (ii) increased extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, (iii) loss of type I muscle fibers, (iv) mitochondrial dysfunction, and (v) intricate cellular signaling orchestrated by TGF-ß1-JNK and TNF-α-MAPK pathways. Alternatively, the HRT model demonstrates improved neurovascular and muscle remodeling responses and increased central nervous system excitability, which might reflect an inherent protective mechanism to stress events.

Keywords: aerobic exercise; central nervous system; exercise‐resistant phenotype; intrinsic running capacity; skeletal muscle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Percentile rank score for the magnitude of change in running capacity (∆DIST) between the low response trainers (LRT) and high response trainers (HRT) rat lines. Orange bars indicate LRT rats, and blue bars indicate HRT rats. Dotted lines indicate the mean change in running capacity for the LRT (orange) and HRT (blue) selected lines (A). Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) measured before and after high‐intensity aerobic interval training in LRT (B) and HRT. VO2max greatly elevated in the HRT line (C). The adaptational response in the LRT and HRT rats observed across studies (D). Adapted from Koch et al. (2013) and Wisløff et al. (2015).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Integrative cellular signaling triggered by impaired glucose tolerance or impaired insulin sensitivity, mitochondrial dysfunction, mediated by intricate cellular signaling orchestrated by TGF‐ß1‐JNK and TNF‐α‐MAPK increased extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling pathways, and loss of type I muscle fibers in LRT models. Adapted from Lessard et al. (2013). TGF‐β1, tissue growth factor beta; TNF‐α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; ECM, extracellular matrix; SL m, sarcolemmal membrane; IRS, insulin receptor substrate; SMAD, nuclear effectors of TGF‐β; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; GLUT4, glucose transporter 4; Nox, NADPH oxidase; ROS, reactive oxygen species; JNK, c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase; p38 MAPK, mitogen‐activated protein kinase; SPEG‐β, striated muscle‐specific serine/threonine‐protein kinase beta; FOXO1, forkhead box protein O1; MuRF‐1, muscle finger protein‐1.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Neurogenesis response, muscle remodeling, and the excitability of the central nervous system are improved in a rat model of high response to training (HRT). Neurogenesis is mediated by increased levels of brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (Marton et al. 2016), greater activation of extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK) in the hippocampus and amygdala, and reduced tyrosine hydroxylase levels in the locus coeruleus (Vanderheyden et al. 2021). Angiogenesis associates with mitogenesis, TGF‐β‐JNK/SMAD signal transduction, and high levels of serine/threonine‐protein kinase beta (SPEGβ) in skeletal muscle (Lessard et al. 2013, 2018). Enhanced skeletal muscle remodeling, including the balance between the hypertrophic and atrophic processes, fiber type, and capillarity, is observed in HRT rats. Genetic traits associated with better endurance training adaptations may also confer advantages in preserving muscle mass during periods of inactivity and immobility, especially in slow‐twitch muscle fibers (MacDonald et al. ; West et al. 2021). HRT‐related responses may reflect an inherent protective mechanism to stress events. TGF‐β, tissue growth factor beta. JNK, c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase. SMAD, nuclear effectors of TGF‐β.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
A representation of the major responses observed in rats bred for low (red color) and high (green color) response to aerobic exercise training.

Similar articles

References

    1. Afroze, D. , and Kumar A.. 2019. “ER Stress in Skeletal Muscle Remodeling and Myopathies.” FEBS Journal 286: 379–398. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahtiainen, J. P. , Lensu S., Ruotsalainen I., et al. 2018. “Physiological Adaptations to Resistance Training in Rats Selectively Bred for Low and High Response to Aerobic Exercise Training.” Experimental Physiology 103: 1513–1523. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bai, X. , Soh K. G., Omar Dev R. D., et al. 2021. “Aerobic Exercise Combination Intervention to Improve Physical Performance Among the Elderly: A Systematic Review.” Frontiers in Physiology 12: 798068. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barascuk, N. , Vassiliadis E., Zheng Q., et al. 2011. “Levels of Circulating MMCN‐151, a Degradation Product of Mimecan, Reflect Pathological Extracellular Matrix Remodeling in Apolipoprotein E Knockout Mice.” Biomarker Insights 6: 7777. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blair, S. N. , Kampert J. B., Kohl H. W., et al. 1996. “Influences of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Other Precursors on Cardiovascular Disease and All‐Cause Mortality in Men and Women.” JAMA 276: 205–210. - PubMed