Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 26:111044.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111044. Online ahead of print.

Measuring contraceptive agency in the community

Affiliations

Measuring contraceptive agency in the community

Maria I Rodriguez et al. Contraception. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the Contraceptive Agency Scale (CAS), developed as a clinic-based measure, within a community population and to assess how agency varied by demographic and reproductive characteristics.

Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1917 participants aged 15-45 years living in Oregon in 2023. Participants responded to the 7-item CAS, comprised items relating to active decision-making, freedom from coercion, and nonjudgmental care during their last health care visit involving contraceptive counseling. We assessed the dimensionality of the CAS and fit data to a partial credit model to analyze its psychometric performance in our community-based sample. Differences in agency by characteristics were assessed with multivariable linear regression.

Results: The CAS showed adequate to good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.78). The CAS items mostly loaded onto a single factor and demonstrated reasonable fit to a partial credit model (information-weighted fit statistics ranged from 0.73 to 1.01). While participants identifying as Black had lower CAS scores than White participants (β coefficient: -1.39 [-2.19, -0.59], p < 0.001), Asian/Pacific Islander, Latino/a, and multiracial participants had significantly higher levels of contraceptive agency than White participants. Not desiring pregnancy was associated with higher contraceptive agency (β coefficient: 1.27 [0.72, 1.82], p < 0.001) In contrast, lower education, some college or less vs college or above (β coefficient: -2.14 [-2.69, -1.60], p < 0.001) and nonbinary/transgender identity vs female gender identity (β coefficient: -1.32 [-2.15, -0.50], p < 0.01) were associated with lower contraceptive agency.

Conclusions: The CAS can be used in a community sample to evaluate patient centered contraceptive decision making as a standard of care.

Implications: Analysis of contraceptive agency among a community-based participant population offers valuable insights into experiences with contraceptive counseling.

Keywords: Contraception; Family planning; Psychometrics; Reproductive autonomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources