Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 15;17(14):2353.
doi: 10.3390/cancers17142353.

Validation of the HFA-ICOS Score for Carfilzomib-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Multiple Myeloma: A Real-Life Perspective Study

Affiliations

Validation of the HFA-ICOS Score for Carfilzomib-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Multiple Myeloma: A Real-Life Perspective Study

Anna Astarita et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Despite the inference about the cardiotoxicity induced by Carfilzomib, no validated risk prediction models for adverse cardiovascular events in a real-life population are available.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the risk stratification score for Carfilzomib-induced cardiotoxicity of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (HFA-ICOS) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Methods: This is a prospective, real-world study including MM patients consecutively enrolled prior to starting Carfilzomib, divided into levels of risk according to the HFA-ICOS proforma.

Results: Of 169 patients, 11.8% were classified as 'low risk', 38.5% as 'medium risk', 45.6% as 'high risk' and 4.1% as 'very high risk' at baseline. A total of 89 (52.7%) patients experienced one of the following events: 36 (21.3%) had at least one cardiovascular event and 77 (45.6%) had almost one hypertension-related event. No significant differences were observed for the incidence of any cardiovascular events between the different levels of risk (p > 0.05), even considering the HFA-ICOS score as a continuous variable. The integration of the score with the baseline systolic blood pressure and pulse wave velocity enhanced the accuracy of the score (AUC 0.557 vs. 0.736).

Conclusions: The HFA-ICOS score did not discriminate between patients at low, medium and high risk, showing a limited discriminatory power in predicting the risk of events in our population. The integration of other parameters in the HFA-ICOS score, such as systolic blood pressure and pulse wave velocity, improved the performance of the score.

Keywords: HFA-ICOS score; cardiotoxicity; carfilzomib; multiple myeloma; risk prediction model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Alberto Milan received honoraria for advisory board from Amgen and Janssen. Sara Bringhen received honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Amgen and Janssen; advisory boards for Amgen, Karyopharm, Janssen and Celgene; and consultancy fees from Takeda and Janssen. Francesca Gay received honoraria from Amgen, Janseen, Celgene, BMS, Takeda, Abbvie; advisory boards for Amgen, Janseen, Celgene, BMS, Takeda, and Abbvie; and advisory adaptive for Roche Oncopeptides. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the study protocol.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Incidence of CVAEs by baseline risk groups of HFO-ICOS score.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Accuracy of the HFO-ICOS in predicting CVAEs. (A) ROC curve of HFO-ICOS score (black line) and of HFO-ICOS comprehensive of blood pressure variability > 10 (dark green line), global longitudinal strain (GLS) > −20% (pink line), left ventricular hypertrophy (blue line), pulse wave velocity ≥ 9 m/s, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 130 mmHg (green line). (B) ROC curve of HFO-ICOS score (black line), HFO-ICOS score comprehensive of pulse wave velocity ≥ 9 m/s (green line), HFO-ICOS score comprehensive of systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 130 mmHg (red line) and HFO-ICOS score comprehensive of both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse wave velocity ≥ 9 m/s (blue line).

Similar articles

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020;70:7–30. - PubMed
    1. Bringhen S., Milan A., D’Agostino M., Ferri C., Wäsch R., Gay F., LaRocca A., Offidani M., Zweegman S., Terpos E., et al. Prevention, monitoring and treatment of cardiovascular adverse events in myeloma patients receiving carfilzomib A consensus paper by the European Myeloma Network and the Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension. J. Intern. Med. 2019;286:63–74. - PubMed
    1. Kistler K.D., Kalman J., Sahni G., Murphy B., Werther W., Rajangam K., Chari A. Incidence and Risk of Cardiac Events in Patients with Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma Versus Matched Patients Without Multiple Myeloma: An Observational, Retrospective, Cohort Study. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017;17:89–96. - PubMed
    1. Georgiopoulos G., Makris N., Laina A., Theodorakakou F., Briasoulis A., Trougakos I.P., Dimopoulos M.A., Kastritis E., Stamatelopoulos K. Cardiovascular Toxicity of Proteasome Inhibitors: Underlying Mechanisms and Management Strategies: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review. JACC CardioOncol. 2023;5:1–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegel D.S., Martin T., Wang M., Vij R., Jakubowiak A.J., Lonial S., Trudel S., Kukreti V., Bahlis N., Alsina M., et al. A phase 2 study of single-agent carfilzomib (PX-171-003-A1) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012;120:2817–2825. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources