Humor Styles Predict Self-Reported Sarcasm Use in Interpersonal Communication
- PMID: 40723706
- PMCID: PMC12292925
- DOI: 10.3390/bs15070922
Humor Styles Predict Self-Reported Sarcasm Use in Interpersonal Communication
Abstract
We investigated how participants' humor styles impact their sarcasm use. English-speaking participants (N = 179) completed online self-report measures of humor styles and sarcasm use. We conducted linear regressions to test whether their humor style scores could predict their sarcasm use scores. Participants with higher affiliative humor scores reported a greater tendency to use sarcasm in general and to use face-saving sarcasm to protect the social images of the speaker and addressee. People use face-saving sarcasm to enhance their relationships, to tease others, and to self-deprecate. Surprisingly, participants who scored high on aggressive humor reported using face-saving sarcasm often. We suspect this occurred because the aggressive humor and the face-saving scales contain conceptually similar items. Participants with high aggressive humor scores also reported frequently using sarcasm to diffuse frustration. Participants who scored high on self-defeating humor reported often using both face-saving sarcasm and sarcasm to diffuse embarrassment. Given that face-saving sarcasm use was uniquely predicted by affiliative humor, aggressive humor, and self-defeating humor scores, we suggest that face-saving sarcasm use has utility for people with a wide range of humor styles. Our findings highlight how an individual's humor style shapes their flexible use of sarcasm in interpersonal relationships.
Keywords: affiliative humor; aggressive humor; face-saving; humor styles; politeness theory; relational humor; sarcasm; self-defeating humor; teasing; verbal irony.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Brown P., Levinson S. C. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press; 1987.
-
- Brownell H. H., Jacobs J. R., Gardner H., Gianoulis D. Conditions for sarcasm. Boston University Aphasia Research Center and Harvard Project Zero; 1990. [Unpublished paper]
-
- Cooper C. D., Sheridan S. B., Kong D. T. Rethinking interpersonal humor in organizations: Clarifying constructs and charting a path forward. Journal of Management Studies. 2025 doi: 10.1111/joms.13245. advance online publication . - DOI
-
- Dews S., Winner E. Muting the meaning: A social function of irony. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity. 1995;10(1):3–19. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms1001_2. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources