Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1977 Jun;5(6):640-9.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.5.6.640-649.1977.

Serological typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: use of commercial antisera and live antigens

Comparative Study

Serological typing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: use of commercial antisera and live antigens

C D Brokopp et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Jun.

Abstract

A practical slide agglutination test, with commercial antisera (Difco) and live antigens (antigens of live bacteria) taken directly from 24-h antimicrobial susceptibility plates, has been established for serotyping Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Until recently, the lack of both a standard antigenic scheme and a source of commercial antisera has made serological typing of this organism impractical. A simplified procedure with 17 unabsorbed antisera and live antigens prepared from materials readily available in most clinical microbiology laboratories makes epidemiological typing of this organism possible in hospital laboratories. The distribution of each serotype examined in this study was determined by using 425 consecutive patient isolates from six different hospitals. The distribution of O antigen groups (live antigen) was as follows: O1, 11.5%; O2, 1.6%; O3, 3.8%; O4, 7.8%; O5, 4.2% O6, 27.1%; O7,8, 5.9%; O9, 6.8%; O10, 2.4%; O11, 8.2%; O12 through O17, each less than 1%. Ten and six-tenths percent of the above agglutinated in two antisera, 3.3% agglutinated in more than two antisera, and 5.2% did not agglutinate in any antisera. A comparison of live and heated antigens shows that 93.2% were typable with the live antigen, and 94.5% were typable with the heated antigen. When both antigens were used, we typed 96.3% of 725 isolates. The reproductibility and specificity of the serological procedure were examined. We recommend using the live antigen for routine serological typing in clinical microbiology laboratories for "in house" epidemiology and reserving the heated antigen for reference and research typing (and for those few cases where results cannot be obtained using the live antigen). The application of serotyping in the study of outbreaks of P. aeruginosa is also presented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Bacteriol. 1946 Feb;51(2):217-34 - PubMed
    1. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1975 Feb;83(1):1-9 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1961 Nov;40:2064-75 - PubMed
    1. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1960;48:56-60 - PubMed
    1. Z Hyg Infektionskr. 1957;144(3):218-28 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources