Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul 8;26(14):6569.
doi: 10.3390/ijms26146569.

Unlocking Implantation: The Role of Nitric Oxide, NO2-NO3, and eNOS in Endometrial Receptivity and IVF Success-A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Unlocking Implantation: The Role of Nitric Oxide, NO2-NO3, and eNOS in Endometrial Receptivity and IVF Success-A Systematic Review

Charalampos Voros et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Nitric oxide (NO) predominantly regulates endometrial receptivity, angiogenesis, immunological tolerance, and trophoblast invasion throughout the implantation period. Both insufficient and excessive nitric oxide production have been linked to suboptimal embryo implantation and infertility. The primary enzymatic source of uterine nitric oxide, along with hormonal, metabolic, and immunological variables and genetic variations in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene (NOS3), affects endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). Despite its considerable importance, there is limited knowledge regarding the practical implementation of nitric oxide-related diagnoses and therapies in reproductive medicine. A comprehensive assessment was performed in accordance with the PRISMA principles. Electronic searches were carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase, and we analyzed the literature published from 2000 to 2024 regarding the association between NO, its metabolites (NO2- and NO3-), eNOS expression, NOS3 gene variants, and reproductive outcomes. Relevant studies encompassed clinical trials, observational studies, and experimental research using either human or animal subjects. We collected data about therapeutic interventions, hormonal and immunological associations, nitric oxide measurement techniques, and in vitro fertilization success rates. A total of thirty-four studies were included. Dysregulated nitric oxide signaling, characterized by modified eNOS expression, oxidative stress, or NOS3 polymorphisms (e.g., Glu298Asp and intron 4 VNTR), was linked to diminished endometrial receptivity and an elevated risk of implantation failure and miscarriage. The dynamics of local uterine NO are essential as elevated and diminished systemic levels of NO2-/NO3- corresponded with enhanced and decreased implantation rates, respectively. Among many therapeutic approaches, targeted hormone treatments, antioxidant therapy, and dietary nitrate supplements have demonstrated potential in restoring nitric oxide balance and enhancing reproductive outcomes. In animal models, the modification of nitric oxide significantly impacted decidualization, angiogenesis, and embryo viability. Nitric oxide is a multifaceted molecular mediator with considerable ramifications for successful implantation. Its therapeutic and diagnostic efficacy increases with its sensitivity to environmental, hormonal, and genetic alterations. Integrating targeted nitric oxide modulation, oxidative stress assessment, and NOS3 genotyping with personalized reproductive therapy will enhance endometrial receptivity and improve IVF outcomes. Future translational research should incorporate nitric oxide signaling into personalized treatment protocols for patients with unexplained infertility or recurrent implantation failure.

Keywords: NO2−; NO3−; NOS3 polymorphisms; eNOS; endometrial microenvironment; endometrial receptivity; implantation failure; in vitro fertilization (IVF); nitric oxide; recurrent pregnancy loss; unexplained infertility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The PRISMA 2020 flow diagram. A flowchart showing the procedure involving the identification, screening, eligibility evaluation, and systematic review of studies following the PRISMA 2020 recommendations [30]. The graph shows the total number of records obtained from databases, duplicates eliminated, records screened, full-text articles evaluated, and the last count of studies incorporated into the qualitative synthesis. There are records of the causes behind excluding full-text articles. * Consider, if feasible to do so, reporting the number of records identified from each database or register searched (rather than the total number across all databases/registers). ** If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by automation tools.

Similar articles

References

    1. Aghajanova L., Hamilton A.E., Giudice L.C. Uterine receptivity to human embryonic implantation: Histology, biomarkers, and transcriptomics. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008;19:204–211. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.10.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bui A.H., Timmons D.B., Young S.L. Evaluation of endometrial receptivity and implantation failure. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022;34:107–113. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000783. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robertson S.A., Moldenhauer L.M., Green E.S., Care A.S., Hull M.L. Immune determinants of endometrial receptivity: A biological perspective. Fertil. Steril. 2022;117:1107–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.04.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mercan R., Guzel Y., Usta İ., Alper E. Embryo versus endometrial receptivity: Untangling a complex debate. Front. Endocrinol. 2025;16:1537847. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1537847. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luo X., He Z., Ma R., Lin N., Li L., Li Y., Ke Y., Meng X., Wu Z. Narrative Review of Multifaceted Approaches to Managing Recurrent Implantation Failure: Insights and Innovations. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2024;51:87. doi: 10.31083/j.ceog5104087. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources