Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 17;16(7):729.
doi: 10.3390/insects16070729.

Authentication of Insect-Based Products in Food and Feed: A Benchmark Survey

Affiliations

Authentication of Insect-Based Products in Food and Feed: A Benchmark Survey

Aline Marien et al. Insects. .

Abstract

The consumption and farming of insects are gaining global attention as sustainable alternatives to conventional protein sources. Industrial processing of insects into powders or pastes complicates species identification, raising concerns about product authenticity, food safety, and potential fraud. In Western countries, particularly in Europe, the sector is expanding under a stringent regulatory framework, especially regarding rearing substrates, which hinders economic development. This study aimed to assess the species authenticity of commercial insect-based food and feed products and detect the presence of animal-derived DNA from unauthorized substrates. A total of 119 samples (pure insect meals and processed products) were collected from various origins. Species-specific real-time PCR assays targeted Tenebrio molitor, Hermetia illucens, Alphitobius diaperinus, Acheta domesticus, Bombyx mori, and Gryllodes sigillatus, alongside assays for ruminant, porcine, and poultry DNA. High-throughput sequencing (HTS) using metabarcoding confirmed and broadened species detection. Most samples contained the declared species; however, cases of mislabeling, substitution, and cross-contamination were observed. A few insect meals contained animal DNA which could suggest potential use of prohibited substrates. These findings highlight the urgent need for standardized authentication methods and improved transparency to ensure regulatory compliance, consumer trust, and sustainable development of the insect-based sector.

Keywords: HTS; PCR; authentication; feed; food; insects; metabarcoding; regulations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Jean-François Morin was employed by the company Eurofins Biologie Moléculaire France, Eurofins. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Omuse E.R., Tonnang H.E.Z., Yusuf A.A., Machekano H., Egonyu J.P., Kimathi E., Mohamed S.F., Kassie M., Subramanian S., Onditi J., et al. The Global Atlas of Edible Insects: Analysis of Diversity and Commonality Contributing to Food Systems and Sustainability. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:5045. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55603-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caparros Megido R., Francis F., Haubruge E., Le Gall P., Tomberlin J.K., Miranda C.D., Jordan H.R., Picard C.J., Pino M.J.M., Ramos-Elordy J., et al. A Worldwide Overview of the Status and Prospects of Edible Insect Production. Entomologia. 2024;44:3–27. doi: 10.1127/entomologia/2023/2279. - DOI
    1. van Huis A. Edible Insects: Challenges and Prospects. Entomol. Res. 2022;52:161–177. doi: 10.1111/1748-5967.12582. - DOI
    1. Żuk-Gołaszewska K., Gałęcki R., Obremski K., Smetana S., Figiel S., Gołaszewski J. Edible Insect Farming in the Context of the EU Regulations and Marketing—An Overview. Insects. 2022;13:446. doi: 10.3390/insects13050446. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lange K.W., Nakamura Y. Edible Insects as a Source of Food Bioactives and Their Potential Health Effects. J. Food Bioact. 2021;14:4–9. doi: 10.31665/JFB.2021.14264. - DOI

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources