Modern Perspectives on Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Narrative Review on Surgical Techniques, Mesh Selection and Fixation Strategies
- PMID: 40725568
- PMCID: PMC12295799
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm14144875
Modern Perspectives on Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Narrative Review on Surgical Techniques, Mesh Selection and Fixation Strategies
Abstract
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, with over 20 million cases annually. The evolution of hernia surgery has transitioned from tension-based techniques to tension-free approaches, significantly reducing recurrence rates. This review explores the history, advancements, and current trends in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair, focusing on laparoscopic techniques such as transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), totally extraperitoneal (TEP), single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), and robotic-assisted repair. The importance of prosthetic meshes is emphasized, detailing their mechanical properties, pore size, weight classifications, and biocompatibility. Additionally, various mesh fixation methods-including tacks, sutures, and glues-are analyzed, with a discussion on their impact on postoperative complications such as chronic pain, adhesions, and infection risk. The debate between TAPP and TEP techniques is examined, highlighting the ongoing quest to determine the most effective approach. Emerging advancements, including drug-loaded meshes and dual-layered prosthetics, aim to improve integration and reduce complications. Despite significant progress, no universally superior technique or mesh exists, underscoring the need for individualized surgical approaches. Future research should focus on optimizing materials, refining fixation strategies, and enhancing patient outcomes in minimally invasive hernia repair.
Keywords: TAPP; TEP; inguinal hernia repair; mesh fixation methods; minimally invasive surgery; prosthetic mesh.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38963034 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 15842951
-
Single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):530-544. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11321-9. Epub 2024 Oct 17. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 39419843
-
A systematic review of randomised control trials assessing mesh fixation in open inguinal hernia repair.Hernia. 2014 Apr;18(2):165-76. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1093-8. Epub 2013 May 7. Hernia. 2014. PMID: 23649403
-
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. PMID: 12535413 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources