Clinical Impact of Viscoelastic Testing in Liver Transplantation: A Before-and-After Study of Transfusion Needs and Outcomes

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Liver transplantation (LT) is often complicated by severe bleeding and coagulopathy. Viscoelastic testing (VET) offers real-time, bedside assessment of coagulation and may improve transfusion management compared to standard tests. This study evaluates the clinical impact of VET implementation during liver transplantation on bleeding, transfusion requirements, complications, and mortality in a single Eastern European tertiary transplant center. Methods: We conducted a single-center before-and-after study comparing patients undergoing LT before and after the implementation of VET. All procedures were performed by the same surgical and anesthetic team using a standardized protocol. Data were collected retrospectively for the Before VET group and prospectively for the After VET group. We compared transfusion requirements, bleeding, complications, and mortality. Results: A total of 59 patients were included, 22 in the After VET group and 37 in the Before VET group. VET implementation was associated with lower intraoperative blood loss (median 4000 mL vs. 6000 mL, p = 0.017) and reduced red blood cell (RBC) transfusion volume (670 mL vs. 1000 mL, p = 0.008). FFP (0.23 vs. 1.59 units, p = 0.007) and platelet use (0.68 vs. 1.81 units, p = 0.035) were also significantly lower in the VET group, while fibrinogen use was higher (3.00 g vs. 2.00 g, p = 0.036). No differences were observed in complication rates or mortality at 30 days and 1 year in this small before-and-after study. Conclusions: VET improved transfusion precision and individualized coagulation management during LT, leading to reduced use of blood products. These findings support the adoption of VET as a standard of care in LT protocols, as it may enhance patient safety, even though no differences in postoperative complications or mortality were observed.

Keywords: bleeding; liver transplantation; transfusion; viscoelastic testing.

Figure 1

Proportion of patients with massive hemorrhage and those receiving each type of transfusion product, presented with corresponding odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.