Robotic Versus Hand-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy: A Comparative Single Center Retrospective Study
- PMID: 40725612
- PMCID: PMC12295647
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm14144919
Robotic Versus Hand-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy: A Comparative Single Center Retrospective Study
Abstract
Background: While there is an abundance of comparative studies on open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomies (RDPs) available in the literature, direct comparisons between RDP and hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (HALDP) are limited. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of RDPs in comparison to HALDPs in the treatment of pancreatic lesions. Methods: This study reviewed 97 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy at Carmel Medical Center between 2008 and 2024. After excluding 40 patients (24 open and 16 pure laparoscopic resections), the final cohort comprised 57 patients: 20 RDPs and 37 HALDPs. The primary outcomes included peri-operative parameters, while secondary outcomes encompassed 90-day morbidity and mortality. Results: RDPs led to significantly longer operative times (3.9 vs. 2.5 h, p < 0.001) but resulted in shorter hospital stays (4.7 vs. 5.8 days, p = 0.02) and a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (11 vs. 5.4, p = 0.01). While clinically significant pancreatic fistula rates were numerically higher in the RDP group (35% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.18), this difference was not statistically significant. Overall, complication rates were comparable (55% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.39). Severe morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa) was absent in the RDP group compared to 8% in the HALDP group (p = 0.04). No 90-day mortality was observed in either group. Conclusions: This study indicates that although RDP involves longer operative times, it may provide certain advantages for patients, such as shorter hospital stays, better lymph node retrieval, and a notable decrease in postoperative morbidity when compared to HALDP. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these results and to determine the most effective surgical approach for distal pancreatectomy.
Keywords: hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery; pancreatectomy; postoperative outcomes; robotic surgery; robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD011391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011391.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27043078 Free PMC article.
-
Stapler versus scalpel resection followed by hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic remnant for distal pancreatectomy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 6;2015(11):CD008688. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008688.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 10;6:CD008688. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008688.pub3. PMID: 26544925 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37642285 Free PMC article.
-
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280. Health Technol Assess. 2008. PMID: 18547499
-
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10:CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4. PMID: 28746980 Free PMC article. Updated.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials