Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 21;14(14):5166.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14145166.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Versus Morphological Selection in Women Aged 35-42: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Versus Morphological Selection in Women Aged 35-42: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Yusuf Beebeejaun et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Embryo selection in IVF is traditionally based on morphology, yet many high-quality embryos fail to implant. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been proposed to improve selection by identifying euploid embryos. However, its effectiveness in women of advanced maternal age remains unclear due to limited randomized data. This pilot trial assessed the feasibility of a full-scale RCT comparing PGT-A to morphology-based selection in women aged 35-42. Methods: This single-centre, two-arm parallel RCT (NCT05009745) enrolled women aged 35-42 undergoing IVF/ICSI with ≥3 good-quality day-3 embryos. Participants were randomized (1:1) to either embryo selection by morphology with fresh transfer or PGT-A with frozen transfer of a single euploid embryo. Allocation concealment was achieved via a secure web-based randomization platform; patients and clinicians were unblinded, but the biostatistician remained blinded. The primary outcome was feasibility of recruitment, randomization, and adherence. Results: Between June 2021 and January 2023, 138 women consented (recruitment rate: 55.8%, 95% CI: 49.7-62.0%) and 100 were randomized. Protocol adherence was 94%. Barriers to recruitment included preference for private PGT-A (19%) or fresh transfer (6%). Among biopsied embryos, 51.4% were euploid and 6.6% low-level mosaic. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant differences between PGT-A and control groups in clinical pregnancy rate (50% vs. 40%), live birth rate (50% vs. 38%), or miscarriage rate (12% vs. 8%). Cumulative live birth rate after up to three SETs was 72% vs. 52%, respectively (p > 0.05). No multiple pregnancies occurred. Conclusions: RCTs of PGT-A in older women are feasible. A multicentre design with broader inclusion criteria could improve recruitment and allow better assessment of clinical benefit.

Keywords: IVF; aneuploidy; embryo mosaicism; preimplantation genetic testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow diagram outlining recruitment, randomization, treatment allocation, and follow-up in the trial assessing the effectiveness of PGT-A on clinical outcomes.

References

    1. Cummins J.M., Breen T.M., Harrison K.L., Shaw J.M., Wilson L.M., Hennessey J.F. A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: Its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality. J. Vitr. Fert. Embryo Transf. 1986;3:284–295. doi: 10.1007/BF01133388. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gardner D.K., Sakkas D. Assessment of Embryo Viability: The Ability to Select a Single Embryo for Transfer—A Review. Placenta. 2003;24:S5–S12. doi: 10.1016/S0143-4004(03)00136-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Claman P., Armant D.R., Seibel M.M., Wang T.A., Oskowitz S.P., Taymor M.L. The impact of embryo quality and quantity on implantation and the establishment of viable pregnancies. J. Vitr. Fert. Embryo Transf. 1987;4:218–222. doi: 10.1007/BF01533759. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Geyter C., Calhaz-Jorge C., Kupka M.S., Wyns C., Mocanu E., Motrenko T., Scaravelli G., Smeenk J., Vidakovic S., Goossens V. ART in Europe, 2014: Results generated from European registries by ESHRE: The European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Hum. Reprod. 2018;33:1586–1601. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey242. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: Proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum. Reprod. 2011;26:1270–1283. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der037. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources