Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024;46(5):542-562.
doi: 10.1080/1360080x.2024.2333594. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

Eradicating dominant ideologies in higher education: the responsibility of campus leadership in developing a culturally-congruent education experience

Affiliations

Eradicating dominant ideologies in higher education: the responsibility of campus leadership in developing a culturally-congruent education experience

Jose H Vargas et al. J High Educ Policy Manag. 2024.

Abstract

Educational leadership serves a pivotal function in establishing the tenor of campus cultures. Executive decisions shape educational policy and practice in ways that either hinder or advance marginalised students' academic success. Leaders are in powerful positions to modify unjust academic ecosystems and to de-ideologise the white-centric dominant ideologies that lead to student pushout. Leadership actions tend to justify the status quo rather than to deconstruct campus culture and reconstruct antiracist options. Inaction from leadership has resulted in cultural discontinuities that lead some students to self-deidentify from academia. This article expands upon cultural mismatch theory to describe how race dysconsciousness, academic capitalism and rugged individualism operate to buttress ecosystemic conditions that create racially-antagonistic campus cultures. We propose strategies that leaders can implement to eradicate dominant ideologies at their home institutions and within educator-student relationships and individual mindsets. We also discuss important considerations and corresponding actions for creating culturally-congruent equity-focused educational spaces.

Keywords: Antiracism; cultural mismatch theory; dominant ideologies; educational leadership; intersectionally-marginalised students of colour; race/racism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The three ecosystems of a hierarchical higher education institution. Inner Dotted Triangle: Psychological Level. Middle Dashed Triangle: Interpersonal Level. Outer Solid Triangle: Institutional Level.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Modification of the cultural mismatch theory.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The three ecosystems of a non-hierarchical higher education institution. Inner Dotted Circle: Psychological Level. Middle Dashed Circle: Interpersonal Level. Outer Solid Circle: Institutional Level.

References

    1. Al Shaibah A (2023). EDI leadership and change agency in Canadian academe: An analysis of democratic discourses of senior leaders. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 55(1), 101–124. 10.1353/ces.2023.0004 - DOI
    1. Avila M, Rivera AA, Perez JB, Knoerr AP, Chai KT, & Vieira PA (2023). Building collective leadership for culture change: Stories of relational organizing on campus and beyond. Cornell University Press.
    1. Azaola MC (2020). Support from extended family in higher education: A narrative literature review. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(8), 1065–1079. 10.1080/0309877X.2019.1648775 - DOI
    1. Bazzi S, Fiszbein M, & Gebresilasse M (2020). Frontier culture: The roots and persistence of “rugged individualism” in the United States. Econometrica, 88(6), 2329–2368. 10.3982/ecta16484 - DOI
    1. Bellah RN, Madsen R, Sullivan WM, Swidler A, & Tipton SM (1986). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. University of California Press.

LinkOut - more resources