Histopathologic Yields and Concordance of In-Bore MRI-targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
- PMID: 40728405
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.241710
Histopathologic Yields and Concordance of In-Bore MRI-targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
Abstract
Background MRI-targeted biopsies are recommended for prostate cancer diagnosis. In-bore MRI-targeted biopsy enables high-precision needle placement; however, the factors affecting prostate cancer detection rates and the potential for grade and patient risk migration require further investigation. Purpose To evaluate factors affecting the detection rate of prostate cancer in patients who underwent in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy and their influence on histologic concordance between biopsy (bGG) and surgical grade group (sGG). Materials and Methods This retrospective study evaluated in-bore MRI-targeted biopsies performed between March 2015 and January 2023. The agreement between bGG and sGG was assessed using Cohen weighted κ. The detection rate of prostate cancer and the concordance rates between bGG and sGG in patients undergoing prostatectomy were compared between biopsy systems (manual and robotic) and by patient biopsy status, lesion size (≤10 mm vs >10 mm), and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category. Results In total, 780 lesions (patient median age, 65 years [IQR, 59-70 years]) were included. Among patients with previous negative biopsy and biopsy-naive patients, the detection rates of grade group (GG) 2 or higher cancer were higher in patients with PI-RADS category 4 or higher lesions (42.5% and 46.5%) and lesions larger than 10 mm (45.1% and 43.4%) (P < .05). Surgical upgrading was higher in lesions with bGG 1 than in those with bGG 2-4 cancers (66.1% vs 16.0% [P < .001]). In the 216 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, bGG and sGG showed moderate to substantial agreement (weighted κ correlation coefficient, 0.61 [95% CI: 0.51, 0.71]). A downgrade of two or more grades between bGG and sGG was rare (5.7%). Histopathologic concordance did not depend on the PI-RADS category, target lesion size, biopsy system, or patient biopsy status (P = .90). Conclusion The in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy detection rates for GG 2 or higher prostate cancer depend on the target lesion size and PI-RADS category, and there is a substantial risk of histologic upgrades in men with GG 1 lesions at MRI-targeted biopsy. © RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Milot in this issue.
Similar articles
-
Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy after Multiparametric Prostate MRI with VERDICT Analysis: The INNOVATE Study.Radiology. 2022 Dec;305(3):623-630. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212536. Epub 2022 Aug 2. Radiology. 2022. PMID: 35916679
-
MRI software and cognitive fusion biopsies in people with suspected prostate cancer: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(61):1-310. doi: 10.3310/PLFG4210. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 39367754 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective Validation of an Automated Hybrid Multidimensional MRI Tool for Prostate Cancer Detection Using Targeted Biopsy: Comparison with PI-RADS-based Assessment.Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025 Jan;7(1):e240156. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240156. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2025. PMID: 39836080 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Concordance with radical prostatectomy specimen of in-bore MRI-guided transperineal vs US-guided transrectal prostate biopsies: A propensity score matched analysis.Fr J Urol. 2025 Aug;35(6-7):102907. doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2025.102907. Epub 2025 May 15. Fr J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40381847
-
Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):517-531. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.041. Epub 2016 Aug 25. Eur Urol. 2017. PMID: 27568655
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous