Urgent vs Elective Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
- PMID: 40730047
- PMCID: PMC12320660
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102039
Urgent vs Elective Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
Abstract
Background: Urgent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly performed for acutely decompensated aortic stenosis, but outcome data remain limited, particularly in contemporary lower-risk populations.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare characteristics, procedural success, and outcomes among patients undergoing urgent vs elective TAVR.
Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at 2 high-volume centers between 2017 and 2023 were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included procedural success, in-hospital complications, and postdischarge outcomes at 30 days and 12 months.
Results: Of 1,414 patients undergoing TAVR, 127 (9.0%) underwent urgent procedures (median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score 3.3 [Q1-Q3: 2.0-5.0]). Compared to elective cases, urgent TAVR patients were younger, more likely to reside in regional or socioeconomically disadvantaged areas, and exhibited more severe valve stenosis with greater cardiac remodeling. Procedural success and post-TAVR valve function were similar between groups. However, urgent TAVR was associated with higher rates of acute kidney injury (9.2% vs 3.4%, P = 0.002), 30-day mortality (2.9% vs 0.8%, P = 0.04), and 12-month mortality (14.3% vs 5.3%, P = 0.02). After multivariable adjustment, 30-day mortality differences were no longer significant, but urgent TAVR remained independently associated with increased acute kidney injury (adjusted OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.17-5.05; P = 0.017) and 12-month mortality (adjusted HR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.06-9.54; P = 0.04).
Conclusions: In this low-intermediate risk cohort, urgent TAVR offered comparable procedural success and adjusted 30-day mortality to elective TAVR but was associated with higher 12-month mortality. These findings support urgent TAVR as a feasible short-term intervention while highlighting the need for targeted strategies to optimize long-term outcomes in high-risk populations.
Keywords: aortic stenosis; cardiac remodeling; mortality; outcomes; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; urgent TAVR.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding support and author disclosures Dr Zhou is supported by a National Heart Foundation of Australia PhD Scholarship (#107683) and a National Health and Medical Research Council Postgraduate Scholarship (#2030768). Dr Stub is supported by the National Heart Foundation of Australia and National Health and Medical Research Council Research Fellowships. Dr Walton is a proctor for Medtronic, Edwards, and Abbott; is on the medical advisory board for Medtronic, Edwards, and Abbott; and receives grant support from Medtronic, Edwards, and Abbott. Dr Stub is on the medical advisory board for Medtronic, Edwards, Abbott, and Anteris. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 39806748 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement is Associated with Comparable Clinical Outcomes to Open Aortic Valve Surgery but with a Reduced Length of In-Patient Hospital Stay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials.Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Mar;26(3):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 29. Heart Lung Circ. 2017. PMID: 27646577
-
Surgical Bailout in Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Incidence, Trends, and Clinical Outcomes.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan 13;18(1):89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.050. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. PMID: 39814498
-
Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Polyvascular Disease.Cardiol Ther. 2025 Sep;14(3):423-437. doi: 10.1007/s40119-025-00415-7. Epub 2025 May 18. Cardiol Ther. 2025. PMID: 40382742 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with non-high surgical risk severe aortic stenosis: A systematic review.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;18(5S1):S40-S48. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 20. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017. PMID: 28410995
References
-
- Makkar R.R., Fontana G.P., Jilaihawi H., et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement for inoperable severe aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1696–1704. - PubMed
-
- Otto C.M., Nishimura R.A., Bonow R.O., et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143(5):e35–e71. - PubMed
-
- Vahanian A., Beyersdorf F., Praz F., et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Rev Esp Cardiol Engl Ed. 2022;75:524. - PubMed
-
- Wald D.S., Williams S., Bangash F., Bestwick J.P. Watchful waiting in aortic stenosis: the problem of acute decompensation. Am J Med. 2018;131:173–177. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources