Dentists' perception and use of AI and robotics in the care of persons with disabilities
- PMID: 40731042
- PMCID: PMC12307922
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-10988-x
Dentists' perception and use of AI and robotics in the care of persons with disabilities
Abstract
Despite the growing role of AI and robotics in healthcare, little is known about their integration into dental care for persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to assess dentists' perceptions and attitudes towards and use of RT/AI in dentistry and identify the predictors of using RT/AI to care for PWDs in the Saudi context. A cross-sectional study was conducted using a previously validated online self-reported questionnaire via SurveyMonkey, targeting 309 Saudi and non-Saudi licensed dentists and dental/oral health practitioners, to collect data on the following: 1) Personal and work-related characteristics, 2) Perception toward RT/AI use, 3) Attitude toward using AI and RT in dentistry, and 4) Current use of RT and AI. RT/AI use rate was calculated for each clinical aspect and each type of impairment. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of dentists' use of RT and AI to provide care for PWDs. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Our study revealed that 59.2% of dentists who worked with PWDs reported utilizing RT/AI in various clinical aspects. Almost one-fourth of dentists reported using RT/AI in clinical examinations (23.9%), managing complications (26.8%), and performing invasive procedures (28.6%). Nearly one-third of respondents reported using RT/AI for taking a history (30%), non-invasive procedures (31.5%), behavioral training sessions (32.9%), health education (36.2%), medical diagnosis (36.6%), diagnostic tests (38%), and treatment planning (43.7%). Over one-half (54.9%) and one-fourth (28.6%) of the dentists reported a positive perception and attitude towards RT/AI use in dentistry. However, after adjusting for possible confounders, only previous RT/AI training remained a significant predictor of RT/AI use among dentists working with PWDs (OR = 9.18, 95% CI 2.92-28.90, p < 0.001). Our study is the first in the Saudi context to investigate the use of RT and AI by dentists caring for PWDs. Previous training was associated with greater use of RT/AI in this context. Potential collaborations between dental institutes and stakeholders in the RT and AI industry are recommended.
Keywords: AI/RT utilization; Dentistry technology; Disability; Impairment; Oral health education; PWDs; Perception; Robotics.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and Consent to participate: Participation in this study was voluntary. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. In electronic informed consent, dentists were assured that their responses would remain anonymous. They were asked to respond to the survey if they agreed to the consent terms. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs (MNG-HA) approved the study, with reference # NRR24/045/7. This study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Attitudes and readiness to adopt artificial intelligence among healthcare practitioners in Pakistan's resource-limited settings.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):1031. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13207-5. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40764570 Free PMC article.
-
Readiness and Acceptance of Nursing Students Regarding AI-Based Health Care Technology on the Training of Nursing Skills in Saudi Arabia: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Nurs. 2025 Jul 30;8:e71653. doi: 10.2196/71653. JMIR Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40737490 Free PMC article.
-
Attitudes of dentists and patients towards the introduction of artificial intelligence in dentistry.J Med Life. 2025 May;18(5):472-477. doi: 10.25122/jml-2024-0382. J Med Life. 2025. PMID: 40599148 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35866452 Free PMC article.
-
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897. Med Teach. 2009. PMID: 19404891
References
-
- Siala, H. & Wang, Y. SHIFTing artificial intelligence to be responsible in healthcare: A systematic review. Soc Sci Med.2022(296), 114782. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114782 (2021). - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical