Advances in Techniques in Radical Prostatectomy
- PMID: 40731851
- PMCID: PMC12300103
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina61071222
Advances in Techniques in Radical Prostatectomy
Abstract
Since its development in 1904, radical prostatectomy (RP) has remained a fundamental surgical option in the management of localised prostate cancer. Over time, continuous advancements in surgical techniques have improved oncological outcomes while reducing functional complications. This narrative review explores the evolution of RP, depicting its progression from the traditional open approach to minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques. Key developments in RP techniques, including nerve-sparing, bladder neck-sparing and Retzius-sparing techniques as well as enhanced perioperative management, have contributed to reduced postoperative complications, namely incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Additionally, technological innovations such as augmented reality, utilising indocyanine green for improved visualisation of prostatic boundaries and illuminare-1 to easily identify nerves intraoperatively, artificial intelligence, and novel molecular imaging technologies such as PSMA PETs for improved margin assessment are shaping the future of RPs. Despite these advancements, challenges persist, including a steep learning curve associated with newer techniques, disparities in access due to cost considerations, and a lack of standardised outcome measures across different surgical approaches. This review provides insight into current trends, ongoing challenges, and future directions that may further refine surgical precision, enhance patient safety, and improve long-term treatment success in prostate cancer management.
Keywords: prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28895658 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(41):1-313. doi: 10.3310/hta16410. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 23127367 Free PMC article.
-
Lateral Approach in Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Introducing Gaston's Technique in Brazil.Int Braz J Urol. 2025 Jul-Aug;51(4):e20250138. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0138. Int Braz J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40327520 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of the Senhance robotic system in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 12;19(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02325-1. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40220022
-
The effect of puboperiurethral suspension stitch placement on climacturia after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.J Sex Med. 2024 Dec 1;21(12):1193-1200. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae130. J Sex Med. 2024. PMID: 39351841
References
-
- World Cancer Research Fund Prostate Cancer Statistics. World Cancer Research Fund. World Cancer Research Fund. 2024. [(accessed on 24 April 2025)]. Available online: https://www.wcrf.org/preventing-cancer/cancer-statistics/prostate-cancer...
-
- Wroński S. Radical Perineal Prostatectomy—The Contemporary Resurgence of a Genuinely Minimally Invasive Procedure: Procedure Outline. Comparison of the advantages, disadvantages, and Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques of Treating organ-confined Prostate Cancer (PCa). A Literature Review with Special Focus on Perineal Prostatectomy. Cent. Eur. J. Urol. 2012;65:188–194. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous