Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 20;17(14):1989.
doi: 10.3390/polym17141989.

Electrospun PANI/PEO-Luffa Cellulose/TiO2 Nanofibers: A Sustainable Biocomposite for Conductive Applications

Gözde Konuk Ege  1 , Merve Bahar Okuyucu  2 , Özge Akay Sefer  2
Affiliations

Electrospun PANI/PEO-Luffa Cellulose/TiO2 Nanofibers: A Sustainable Biocomposite for Conductive Applications

Gözde Konuk Ege et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

Herein, electrospun nanofibers composed of polyaniline (PANI), polyethylene oxide (PEO), and Luffa cylindrica (LC) cellulose, reinforced with titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles, were synthesized via electrospinning to investigate the effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on PANI/PEO/LC nanocomposites and the effect of conductivity on nanofiber morphology. Cellulose extracted from luffa was added to the PANI/PEO copolymer solution, and two different ratios of TiO2 were mixed into the PANI/PEO/LC biocomposite. The morphological, vibrational, and thermal characteristics of biocomposites were systematically investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). As anticipated, the presence of TiO2 enhanced the electrical conductivity of biocomposites, while the addition of Luffa cellulose further improved the conductivity of the cellulose-based nanofibers. FTIR analysis confirmed chemical interactions between Luffa cellulose and PANI/PEO matrix, as evidenced by the broadening of the hydroxyl (OH) absorption band at 3500-3200 cm-1. Additionally, the emergence of characteristic peaks within the 400-1000 cm-1 range in the PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2 spectra signified Ti-O-Ti and Ti-O-C vibrations, confirming the incorporation of TiO2 into the biocomposite. SEM images of the biocomposites reveal that the thickness of nanofibers decreases by adding Luffa to PANI/PEO nanofibers because of the nanofibers branching. In addition, when blending TiO2 nanoparticles with the PANI/PEO/LC biocomposite, this increment continued and obtained thinner and smother nanofibers. Furthermore, the incorporation of cellulose slightly improved the crystallinity of the nanofibers, while TiO2 contributed to the enhanced crystallinity of the biocomposite according to the XRD and DCS results. Similarly, the TGA results supported the DSC results regarding the increasing thermal stability of the biocomposite nanofibers with TiO2 nanoparticles. These findings demonstrate the potential of PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2 nanofibers for advanced applications requiring conductive and structurally optimized biomaterials, e.g., for use in humidity or volatile organic compound (VOC) sensors, especially where flexibility and environmental sustainability are required.

Keywords: biopolymer; electrospinning; luffa; nanofiber; titanium dioxide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of fabrication of electrospun PANI/PEO, PANI/LC, PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2, and PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2:2 composites.
Figure 2
Figure 2
FT-IR spectra of PANI/PEO, PANI/PEO/LC, PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2, and PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2:2 composites nanofibers.
Figure 3
Figure 3
XRD spectra of PANI/PEO, PANI/LC, PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2, and PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2:2 composites nanofibers.
Figure 4
Figure 4
SEM micrographs of PANI/PEO, PANI/PEO/LC, PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2, and PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2:2 composites nanofibers.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Diameter distribution of fibers of electrospun PANI/PEO, PANI/PEO/LC, PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2, and PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2:2 composites.
Figure 6
Figure 6
DSC curves of electrospun PANI/PEO, PANI/PEO/LC, PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2, and PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2:2 composites.
Figure 7
Figure 7
TGA thermograms of electrospun PANI/PEO, PANI/PEO/LC, PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2, and PANI/PEO/LC/TiO2:2 composites.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Priyanka, Yadav D., Dutta J. Switching to Bioplastics for Sustaining Our Environment. In: Gothandam K.M., Srinivasan R., Ranjan S., Dasgupta N., Lichtfouse E., editors. Environmental Biotechnology Volume 4. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2021. pp. 1–45.
    1. Zhang J., Chen K., Ding C., Sun S., Zheng Y., Ding Q., Hong B., Liu W. Fabrication of Chitosan/PVP/Dihydroquercetin Nanocomposite Film for In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of Wound Healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022;206:591–604. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.110. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brischetto S. Analysis of Natural Fibre Composites for Aerospace Structures. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 2018;90:1372–1384. doi: 10.1108/AEAT-06-2017-0152. - DOI
    1. Chandgude S., Salunkhe S. In State of Art: Mechanical Behavior of Natural Fiber-Based Hybrid Polymeric Composites for Application of Automobile Components. Polym. Compos. 2021;42:2678–2703. doi: 10.1002/pc.26045. - DOI
    1. Rahman N.S.A., Yhaya M.F., Azahari B., Ismail W.R. Utilisation of Natural Cellulose Fibres in Wastewater Treatment. Cellulose. 2018;25:4887–4903. doi: 10.1007/s10570-018-1935-8. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources